Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Sat Oct 10, 2015, 05:55 AM Oct 2015

Banned In (17th Century) Boston: Religious Tolerance

http://wgbhnews.org/post/banned-17th-century-boston-religious-tolerance



"Return of Roger Williams from England with the First Charter," 1644.

Banned In (17th Century) Boston: Religious Tolerance
By Edgar B. Herwick III

Just how Puritan was early colonial New England? The first legal code, The Body of Liberties, was written by a minister.

Among the offenses that could get you put to death: worshipping another god, blaspheming, and committing adultery. Sure, the separation of church and state, and your right to religious freedom, are bedrocks of the American way of life today— but it hasn't always been like that.

"The Massachusetts government was almost a theocracy," said John Barry, author of "Roger Williams and the Birth of the America Soul." "Everybody in it believed that the goal of Massachusetts’s government was to fulfill God’s will."

It was this theocratic world that Roger Williams stepped into, when he arrived in Boston from England in the winter of 1631.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Banned In (17th Century) Boston: Religious Tolerance (Original Post) unhappycamper Oct 2015 OP
And even today every religious outfit feels entitled to rule in MA Demeter Oct 2015 #1
hmm, UU's development had much more to do with Victorian shifts MisterP Oct 2015 #2
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
1. And even today every religious outfit feels entitled to rule in MA
Sat Oct 10, 2015, 06:15 AM
Oct 2015

and the bad idea leaks out to other parts of the country.

The only religion of the Enlightenment: Unitarian Universalism, is a shadow of its former self, because it doesn't put boundaries around itself--

Unitarian Universalist congregations affirm and promote seven Principles, which we hold as strong values and moral guides. We live out these Principles within a “living tradition” of wisdom and spirituality, drawn from sources as diverse as science, poetry, scripture, and personal experience.

As Rev. Barbara Wells ten Hove explains, “The Principles are not dogma or doctrine, but rather a guide for those of us who choose to join and participate in Unitarian Universalist religious communities.”

1st Principle: The inherent worth and dignity of every person;
2nd Principle: Justice, equity and compassion in human relations;
3rd Principle: Acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth in our congregations;
4th Principle: A free and responsible search for truth and meaning;
5th Principle: The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large;
6th Principle: The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all;
7th Principle: Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.

The seven Principles and six Sources of the Unitarian Universalist Association grew out of the grassroots of our communities, were affirmed democratically, and are part of who we are. Read them as they are written in our UUA Bylaws.

http://www.uua.org/beliefs/what-we-believe/principles

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
2. hmm, UU's development had much more to do with Victorian shifts
Sat Oct 10, 2015, 12:25 PM
Oct 2015

and I may add that all the Congregationalist Founders thought of themselves as tip-top Enlightened: even their effort to ban Papists was the peak of Enlightenment, and many would've agreed

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»Banned In (17th Century) ...