Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(61,138 posts)
Tue Mar 8, 2022, 01:58 PM Mar 2022

Apparently, a Missouri mine owner had it with MSHA inspections.

Last edited Tue Mar 8, 2022, 05:09 PM - Edit history (2)

Kenwardjr Retweeted

Apparently, a Missouri mine owner had it w/ MSHA inspections.

He used loading equipment filled w/ rocks and dirt to force MSHA inspectors off the road, according to the safety agency.

He "allowed" the inspection after a court and U.S. Marshals got involved.



News Release

FEDERAL COURT ORDERS MISSOURI MINE OWNER – WHO FORCED INSPECTORS OFF THE ROAD – TO ALLOW US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR INSPECTORS TO COMPLETE SAFETY INSPECTIONS

Westley Partridge defied, harassed inspectors during August 2021 visit

WASHINGTON – A federal district court judge issued an injunction to prevent a Missouri mine operator and its owner from stopping federal inspectors from completing workplace safety inspections now and in the future at the Partridge Sand & Gravel mine in Stone.

The court action follows an incident at the mine on Aug. 17, 2021, when inspectors with the U.S. Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration tried to conduct a statutorily required inspection. As they drove toward the mine, its owner – Westley Partridge – used loading equipment filled with rocks and dirt to force the MSHA inspectors’ vehicle off the road. Partridge then verbally harassed the inspectors and ordered them off the property.

In response, the department’s Office of the Solicitor filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri on Sept. 28, 2021, to ensure MSHA inspectors had access to the mine. On Dec. 14, the U.S. Marshals Service served the complaint on Partridge. On Jan. 12, 2022, Partridge allowed MSHA inspectors to inspect the mine.

On Feb. 2, 2022, Partridge and his company, Partridge Sand & Gravel Inc. agreed to a consent judgment barring them from interfering with, delaying or impeding a mine inspection. The judgment also bars them from threatening, harassing, or intimidating an MSHA inspector carrying out the provisions of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977.

“Congress mandated regular Mine Safety and Health Administration inspections to protect the health and safety of our nation’s miners. We will not allow mine operators to prevent the U.S. Department of Labor from doing its vital work,” said Solicitor of Labor Seema Nanda. “We appreciate the U.S. Marshals Service for their efforts in helping us enforce the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act.”

“To perform our agency’s critical work and protect the nation’s miners, our inspectors need access to all mine operations,” said Acting Assistant Secretary for Mine Safety and Health Jeannette Galanis. “The actions of the U.S. Department of Labor make clear that the department will not tolerate mine operators who unlawfully prevent safety inspectors from doing their job.”

Learn more about MSHA.

Agency: Mine Safety & Health Administration
Date: March 4, 2022
Release: Number 22-205-NAT

Media: Contact: Mandy McClure
Phone: Number 202-693-4675
Email: McClure.Amanda.C@dol.gov

Media Contact: Denisha Braxton
Phone Number: 202-693-5061
Email: braxton.denisha.l@dol.gov
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Apparently, a Missouri mine owner had it with MSHA inspections. (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2022 OP
That sounds like a felony to me exboyfil Mar 2022 #1
Part of that "criminal conspiracy" should be the mine itself. ret5hd Mar 2022 #2
Another idiot from Missouri rustysgurl Mar 2022 #3
Definitely Rebl2 Mar 2022 #5
Sweeping generalization there Sherman A1 Mar 2022 #6
I didn't say everyone in Missouri was an idiot rustysgurl Mar 2022 #7
It continues to be a sweeping generalization Sherman A1 Mar 2022 #8
"How dear them gubment men come in here to try to keep my workers safe and Chainfire Mar 2022 #4

exboyfil

(18,008 posts)
1. That sounds like a felony to me
Tue Mar 8, 2022, 02:06 PM
Mar 2022

All those involved should be arrested. It is also a criminal conspiracy. The equipment used in furtherance of the criminal conspiracy should be subject to civil forfeiture laws. Far more evidence of this than a guy traveling with some cash.

Should play hardball with these mofos.

rustysgurl

(1,050 posts)
7. I didn't say everyone in Missouri was an idiot
Tue Mar 8, 2022, 09:12 PM
Mar 2022

Just a LOT of them. I've lived among them in numerous locations (cities and small towns). When you talk about people voting against their own interests, refusing to educate themselves on issues, etc., a lot of Missourians are A+ idiots. It's called the Show Me State for a reason. But you used to be able to show them and they could and would change their point of view. Now, they are so dug in nothing you say matters. And again, I am not speaking of ALL Missourians.

Insulting? Maybe so. If the shoe fits. I won't apologize for it.

 

Chainfire

(17,757 posts)
4. "How dear them gubment men come in here to try to keep my workers safe and
Tue Mar 8, 2022, 03:23 PM
Mar 2022

cost me money. The men should be happy that they have jobs and they know and accept the dangers..."

It sounds like he got a "Slap on the wrist and a don't do that again."

When I was working in commercial construction, as part of a subcontractor's team, when the OSHA men came, we always had at least few minutes warning. We were told to abandon our "questionable" tools, especially electric tools, and power cords, and knock off and go home. My idiot coworkers thought that it was a hoot, getting over on the safety inspectors like that. I just had to shake my head in disbelief. My employer never got a fine. (and we didn't get paid for the time off) I ended my construction career with that employer with a dispute over jobsite safety. The only thing that mattered was production, safety was not a part of the program.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Missouri»Apparently, a Missouri mi...