Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Montana
Related: About this forumProminent Republican says Montana should 'throw out' state Constitution
This came from the Billings Gazette. They got it from an outfit I've never heard of the Montana Free Press. The Montana Free Press exists only online. It doesn't seem to have an axe to grind.
EDITOR'S PICK
Prominent Republican says Montana should throw out state Constitution
Eric Dietrich Montana Free Press 20 hrs ago
In a comment published by the Flathead Beacon, prominent Rep. Derek Skees, R-Kalispell, disparaged Montanas state Constitution, lamenting that its right of privacy clause has given state courts a legal basis for blocking new abortion restrictions and calling the document a socialist rag that should be replaced.
{snip}
Reached by text last Thursday with a description of the quote published by the Beacon and a request for further explanation, Skees said he was at a hunting camp. He did not disavow the quote or dispute its accuracy.
{snip}
The current Montana Constitution, ratified with a statewide vote in 1972, replaced the prior constitution adopted with statehood in 1889. Amendments can be advanced either by citizen initiative, requiring signatures from 10% of qualified voters, or by the Legislature with support from at least two-thirds of the states 150 representatives and senators. In either case, amendments dont become constitutional law unless they survive any court challenges and win majority support in a statewide vote.
Similar initiative and legislative processes can spur a call for a convention to draft a new constitution, and Montanans must also vote on whether they want to replace the 1972 Constitution at least once every 20 years. Votes to call a new convention failed by an 18-82 margin in 1990 and a 41-59 margin in 2010.
Republicans currently hold 98 seats between the Montana House and Senate, meaning they could win enough support for the GOP to unilaterally place constitutional amendments before voters if the party picks up two more legislative seats in next years election cycle.
{snip}
This story is printed with the permission of the Montana Free Press. The original story can be accessed here.
Prominent Republican says Montana should throw out state Constitution
Eric Dietrich Montana Free Press 20 hrs ago
In a comment published by the Flathead Beacon, prominent Rep. Derek Skees, R-Kalispell, disparaged Montanas state Constitution, lamenting that its right of privacy clause has given state courts a legal basis for blocking new abortion restrictions and calling the document a socialist rag that should be replaced.
{snip}
Reached by text last Thursday with a description of the quote published by the Beacon and a request for further explanation, Skees said he was at a hunting camp. He did not disavow the quote or dispute its accuracy.
{snip}
The current Montana Constitution, ratified with a statewide vote in 1972, replaced the prior constitution adopted with statehood in 1889. Amendments can be advanced either by citizen initiative, requiring signatures from 10% of qualified voters, or by the Legislature with support from at least two-thirds of the states 150 representatives and senators. In either case, amendments dont become constitutional law unless they survive any court challenges and win majority support in a statewide vote.
Similar initiative and legislative processes can spur a call for a convention to draft a new constitution, and Montanans must also vote on whether they want to replace the 1972 Constitution at least once every 20 years. Votes to call a new convention failed by an 18-82 margin in 1990 and a 41-59 margin in 2010.
Republicans currently hold 98 seats between the Montana House and Senate, meaning they could win enough support for the GOP to unilaterally place constitutional amendments before voters if the party picks up two more legislative seats in next years election cycle.
{snip}
This story is printed with the permission of the Montana Free Press. The original story can be accessed here.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1708 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Prominent Republican says Montana should 'throw out' state Constitution (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2021
OP
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Tetrachloride This message was self-deleted by its author.
sinkingfeeling
(52,989 posts)2. So, civil rights are now 'socialism' in the minds if the GQP.
Tells one where they want to take the country.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(26,727 posts)3. Given that the Roe v Wade decision depended on a right to privacy
being implicit, although not explicitly in the Constitution, I find that quite interesting.