New York
Related: About this forumelleng
(136,043 posts)The New York Court of Appeals said Democrats violated the State Constitution and ignored the will of the voters. The judges ordered a court-appointed expert to draw replacements.
'In a sweeping 32-page ruling, a divided New York State Court of Appeals chided Democrats for defying the will of voters who in 2014 adopted constitutional reforms, including a new outside commission, to curb political influence in the redistricting process. The judges additionally found that the congressional districts drawn by Democrats had violated an explicit state ban on partisan gerrymandering.
Through the 2014 amendments, the people of this state adopted substantial redistricting reforms aimed at ensuring that the starting point for redistricting legislation would be district lines proffered by a bipartisan commission following significant public participation, thereby ensuring each political party and all interested persons a voice in the composition of those lines, Chief Judge Janet DiFiore wrote for the four-judge majority.
The verdict, which is not subject to appeal, delivered a stinging defeat to Democrats in Albany and in Washington and cast this years election cycle into deep uncertainty. To accommodate the drawing of new districts, the Court of Appeals indicated that party primaries for the congressional and State Senate districts would have to be postponed from June until August.
The judges were silent on whether to move contests for governor and State Assembly seats, as well, but they noted in the majority opinion that New York had held bifurcated primaries before. Given the judges reasoning the Assembly maps appear only to have survived because Republicans who brought he suit did not explicitly challenge them.'>>>
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/27/nyregion/redistricting-congress-gerrymander-ny.html
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)we agree with petitioners and the court that the congressional map was unconstitutionalin that it violated article III, § 4 (c) (5), which provides as relevant here that [d]istricts shall not be drawn to discourage competition or for the purpose of favoring or disfavoring incumbents or other particular candidates or political parties.
...
We conclude that evidence of the largely one-party process used to enact the 2022 congressional map, a comparison of the 2022 congressional map to the 2012 congressional map, and the expert opinion and supporting analysis of Sean P. Trende, met petitioners burden of establishing that the 2022 congressional map was drawn to discourage competition and favor democrats in violation of article III, § 4 (c) (5).
...
Whole 14 page decision...
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/2022-04-20-NY-order-.pdf