Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

North Carolina

littlemissmartypants

(25,498 posts) Thu Mar 7, 2019, 11:08 PM Mar 2019

A fifth arrest has taken place in District 9

A woman was arrested for possession of absentee ballots.

http://www.wbtv.com/2019/03/06/fourth-arrest-made-election-related-crimes-connected-nc-investigation/

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A fifth arrest has taken place in District 9 (Original Post) littlemissmartypants Mar 2019 OP

No Mark Harris arrest? Historic NY Mar 2019 #1

Not yet. nt greyl Mar 2019 #2

Video at the link The NC-9 election fraud investigation littlemissmartypants Mar 2019 #3

the scifi nerd in me qazplm135 Mar 2019 #4

Historic NY

(37,859 posts)

1. No Mark Harris arrest?

Reply to littlemissmartypants (Original post)

Thu Mar 7, 2019, 11:15 PM

Mar 2019

greyl

(22,997 posts)

2. Not yet. nt

Reply to Historic NY (Reply #1)

Thu Mar 7, 2019, 11:20 PM

Mar 2019

littlemissmartypants

(25,498 posts)

3. Video at the link The NC-9 election fraud investigation

Reply to Historic NY (Reply #1)

Thu Mar 7, 2019, 11:31 PM

Mar 2019

Mark Harris called for a new election in the disputed 9th District on Thursday afternoon, Feb. 21, 2019. He said he suffered two strokes in January and is “struggling” to get through the hearing, now in its fourth day. By NC State Board of Elections

The NC-9 election fraud investigation

https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article227128739.html

qazplm135

(7,502 posts)

4. the scifi nerd in me

Reply to littlemissmartypants (Original post)

Thu Mar 7, 2019, 11:56 PM

Mar 2019

is chuckling at the title here.

Reply to this discussion