Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,798 posts)
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 11:07 PM Mar 2017

Opponents: North Dakota-owned casinos would hurt tribes

BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A change to the North Dakota Constitution allowing state-owned casinos will hurt American Indian gambling facilities and further erode relationships with tribes, opponents of the proposal told lawmakers Monday.

The proposal comes after months of protests of the $3.8 billion Dakota Access pipeline's disputed crossing under a Missouri River reservoir near the Standing Rock Sioux reservation in North Dakota.

"Tribal and state relations are at an all-time low, so low that we are in a deficit, in the red," Ruth Buffalo, of Mandaree, told the House Judiciary Committee. "The state of North Dakota needs to be worrying about how they can fix relationships with tribes."

Rep. Al Carlson, R-Fargo, said the idea behind the proposed constitutional amendment is to establish casinos as "destination-oriented attractions" and use profits from them to lessen — or eliminate altogether — state sales tax and corporate income tax.

Read more: http://bismarcktribune.com/news/state-and-regional/opponents-north-dakota-owned-casinos-would-hurt-tribes/article_ee1ea594-2439-54d5-a016-3ae1f0cfd68b.html

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»North Dakota»Opponents: North Dakota-o...