Pennsylvania
Related: About this forumPhilly's soda tax didn't lead to people drinking less soda, study says
Philadelphias tax on soda and other sweetened beverages has not reduced residents consumption of such drinks, according to a new study.
Philadelphians reported a slight but not statistically significant decrease in sugary beverage consumption compared with residents of nearby cities without a tax, Drexel University researchers found in surveys taken before and after the tax took effect.
We have ample evidence that sugary beverages are connected to type 2 diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and other health issues, but were seeing that raising the price of sugary beverages may not impact consumers who dont drink a lot of soda, Amy Auchincloss, an associate professor at Drexels Dornsife School of Public Health, said in a statement about the research.
Philadelphia became the first large U.S. city to pass a tax on soda in 2016. Mayor Jim Kenney championed the tax as a means of funding pre-K, community schools, and improvements to parks, recreation centers, and libraries. Public health advocates praised Philadelphias levy and have pointed to taxes on soda as a means of reducing consumption and improving residents health.
Read more: https://www.inquirer.com/politics/philadelphia/philadelphia-soda-tax-drexel-study-20200227.html
BlueTsunami2018
(4,000 posts)I know people who will spend more money in gas to go buy soda outside the city than the tax would cost them if they just went to the local supermarket. They absolutely hate it and the mayor and especially the D.A.. Im talking apoplectic rage.
Its kind of funny.
Freddie
(9,691 posts)In a neighborhood that really needs a supermarket. Owner blamed the soda tax. Is that all people buy?? One thing that bothers me is they also tax sugar-free beverages, which negates the health issue of sugary drinks. But yeah, youd think it was the end of the world.
PBC_Democrat
(403 posts)No one ever seriously believed that the tax was being implemented to improve public health.
Be honest ... tell the public that you need the money for a good cause and you decided to tax this or that product or service.
If it's a good idea and has public support, it won't be a problem.
Squinch
(52,729 posts)Freddie
(9,691 posts)Like taxes on liquor and cigarettes. You dont need to drink, smoke or drink soda to exist. Personally I think thats a lot more fair than a tax on groceries like some states do.
FakeNoose
(35,657 posts)Consumers will still ultimately pay the tax. But when the manufacturers and marketers feel the pinch, they will develop healthier products that don't contain the sugar or high-fructose sweeteners.
Freddie
(9,691 posts)Taxes all sweetened beverages no matter what theyre sweetened with (sugar, artificial sweetener, something all-natural). Which is wrong if this is about health.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)question is, What has happened to all this tobacco tax/soda tax money? asking for my five friends...