Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,744 posts)
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 04:46 AM Feb 2020

Philly's soda tax didn't lead to people drinking less soda, study says

Philadelphia’s tax on soda and other sweetened beverages has not reduced residents’ consumption of such drinks, according to a new study.

Philadelphians reported a slight but not statistically significant decrease in sugary beverage consumption compared with residents of nearby cities without a tax, Drexel University researchers found in surveys taken before and after the tax took effect.

“We have ample evidence that sugary beverages are connected to type 2 diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and other health issues, but we’re seeing that raising the price of sugary beverages may not impact consumers who don’t drink a lot of soda,” Amy Auchincloss, an associate professor at Drexel’s Dornsife School of Public Health, said in a statement about the research.

Philadelphia became the first large U.S. city to pass a tax on soda in 2016. Mayor Jim Kenney championed the tax as a means of funding pre-K, community schools, and improvements to parks, recreation centers, and libraries. Public health advocates praised Philadelphia’s levy and have pointed to taxes on soda as a means of reducing consumption and improving residents’ health.

Read more: https://www.inquirer.com/politics/philadelphia/philadelphia-soda-tax-drexel-study-20200227.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Philly's soda tax didn't lead to people drinking less soda, study says (Original Post) TexasTowelie Feb 2020 OP
The way people here complain about it, you'd think it was the end of the world. BlueTsunami2018 Feb 2020 #1
Major supermarket closed Freddie Feb 2020 #4
People hate being lied to ... PBC_Democrat Feb 2020 #2
Soda really is pretty bad for you. It was worth a try. Squinch Feb 2020 #3
It's a "sin tax" Freddie Feb 2020 #5
The tax should be on the soda manufacturers and distributors FakeNoose Feb 2020 #6
The Philly soda tax Freddie Feb 2020 #8
When Obama doubled the cost of cigarettes it didn't change my smoking habit. So now the abqtommy Feb 2020 #7

BlueTsunami2018

(4,000 posts)
1. The way people here complain about it, you'd think it was the end of the world.
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 05:49 AM
Feb 2020

I know people who will spend more money in gas to go buy soda outside the city than the tax would cost them if they just went to the local supermarket. They absolutely hate it and the mayor and especially the D.A.. I’m talking apoplectic rage.

It’s kind of funny.

Freddie

(9,691 posts)
4. Major supermarket closed
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 08:45 AM
Feb 2020

In a neighborhood that really needs a supermarket. Owner blamed the soda tax. Is that all people buy?? One thing that bothers me is they also tax sugar-free beverages, which negates the “health” issue of sugary drinks. But yeah, you’d think it was the end of the world.

PBC_Democrat

(403 posts)
2. People hate being lied to ...
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 07:10 AM
Feb 2020

No one ever seriously believed that the tax was being implemented to improve public health.

Be honest ... tell the public that you need the money for a good cause and you decided to tax this or that product or service.

If it's a good idea and has public support, it won't be a problem.

Freddie

(9,691 posts)
5. It's a "sin tax"
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 08:48 AM
Feb 2020

Like taxes on liquor and cigarettes. You don’t need to drink, smoke or drink soda to exist. Personally I think that’s a lot more fair than a tax on groceries like some states do.

FakeNoose

(35,657 posts)
6. The tax should be on the soda manufacturers and distributors
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 08:50 AM
Feb 2020

Consumers will still ultimately pay the tax. But when the manufacturers and marketers feel the pinch, they will develop healthier products that don't contain the sugar or high-fructose sweeteners.


Freddie

(9,691 posts)
8. The Philly soda tax
Sat Feb 29, 2020, 09:00 AM
Feb 2020

Taxes all sweetened beverages no matter what they’re sweetened with (sugar, artificial sweetener, something all-natural). Which is wrong if this is about health.

abqtommy

(14,118 posts)
7. When Obama doubled the cost of cigarettes it didn't change my smoking habit. So now the
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 08:56 AM
Feb 2020

question is, What has happened to all this tobacco tax/soda tax money? asking for my five friends...

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Philly's soda tax didn't ...