Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pennsylvania

mahatmakanejeeves

(60,949 posts) Wed May 26, 2021, 11:15 AM May 2021

A New Crop in Pennsylvania: Warehouses

NYT Business Retweeted

The astonishing growth of e-commerce has created a warehouse boom in and around Pennsylvania's Lehigh Valley, one that is changing the region's landscape. On A1 of today's
@nytimes
,
@mcorkery5
took a close look at what's happening

Link to tweet

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A New Crop in Pennsylvania: Warehouses (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves May 2021 OP

I have read that Diamond_Dog May 2021 #1

Wish they'd do more of that, plenty of empty big box stores around Amishman Jun 2021 #4

;-{) Goonch May 2021 #2

Someone Will Be Imploding These Things modrepub May 2021 #3

Diamond_Dog

(34,640 posts)

1. I have read that

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Wed May 26, 2021, 11:24 AM

May 2021

Old shopping malls are being re-purposed as warehouses.

Amishman

(5,816 posts)

4. Wish they'd do more of that, plenty of empty big box stores around

Reply to Diamond_Dog (Reply #1)

Tue Jun 1, 2021, 12:43 PM

Jun 2021

No need to build new structures when there is something suitable already available.

Goonch

(3,811 posts)

2. ;-{)

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Wed May 26, 2021, 11:27 AM

May 2021

modrepub

(3,613 posts)

3. Someone Will Be Imploding These Things

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Wed May 26, 2021, 11:37 AM

May 2021

at some point in the future. Doubt local zoning boards are thinking about what happens to these concrete monsters once they've served their purpose.

Reply to this discussion