Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Pennsylvania
Related: About this forumHe spent 34 years in prison. Evidence on file for decades exonerated him last month.
National
He spent 34 years in prison. Evidence on file for decades exonerated him last month.
Risheen Crosland, left, and his father, Curtis Crosland, gather with family members in Philadelphia last month after Curtis Crosland was released from prison for a crime he did not commit. (Jessica Griffin/AP)
By Caroline Anders
Today at 12:11 a.m. EDT
Decades ago, two witnesses linked Curtis Crosland to the killing of South Philadelphia grocery store owner Il Man Heo during a nighttime robbery.
No physical evidence connected Crosland to the scene, according to court documents. He was convicted and sentenced to life in prison based entirely on their statements, the Philadelphia District Attorneys Office says.
Crosland spent 34 years more than half his life in prison for the crime. But the state now says investigators may have not handed over troubling information that would have undermined the witnesses credibility decades ago and pointed to another suspect.
The case that left Crosland behind bars for decades was recently unraveled by the district attorneys office. After the offices conviction integrity unit (CIU) created to examine assertions of innocence and wrongful conviction launched an investigation into the case, the 60-year-old was exonerated and released from prison in late June.
{snip}
By Caroline Anders
Caroline Anders is a reporting intern on the General Assignment desk. Twitter https://twitter.com/caroIineanders
He spent 34 years in prison. Evidence on file for decades exonerated him last month.
Risheen Crosland, left, and his father, Curtis Crosland, gather with family members in Philadelphia last month after Curtis Crosland was released from prison for a crime he did not commit. (Jessica Griffin/AP)
By Caroline Anders
Today at 12:11 a.m. EDT
Decades ago, two witnesses linked Curtis Crosland to the killing of South Philadelphia grocery store owner Il Man Heo during a nighttime robbery.
No physical evidence connected Crosland to the scene, according to court documents. He was convicted and sentenced to life in prison based entirely on their statements, the Philadelphia District Attorneys Office says.
Crosland spent 34 years more than half his life in prison for the crime. But the state now says investigators may have not handed over troubling information that would have undermined the witnesses credibility decades ago and pointed to another suspect.
The case that left Crosland behind bars for decades was recently unraveled by the district attorneys office. After the offices conviction integrity unit (CIU) created to examine assertions of innocence and wrongful conviction launched an investigation into the case, the 60-year-old was exonerated and released from prison in late June.
{snip}
By Caroline Anders
Caroline Anders is a reporting intern on the General Assignment desk. Twitter https://twitter.com/caroIineanders
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
He spent 34 years in prison. Evidence on file for decades exonerated him last month. (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2021
OP
marble falls
(62,441 posts)1. Justice delayed is justice denied.
FakeNoose
(35,946 posts)2. Why does it always seem to be black males
... that get unfairly and illegally railroaded by prosecutors?
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,595 posts)3. Racial bias
What else could it be?
FakeNoose
(35,946 posts)4. It could be the quality of the defense lawyers
For example, the public defenders are almost always going to tell their clients plead guilty, even if they say they're innocent. Meanwhile a white defendant can (maybe) afford to hire a good lawyer and get off, even if he/she is guilty.