Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
OMG, guest editorial in The Tennessean... (Original Post) Duppers Oct 2022 OP
Oh, this asshole NewHendoLib Oct 2022 #1
Couldn't think his way out of a wet paper bag. onecaliberal Oct 2022 #2
IS TRUMP ABOVE THE LAW OR IS HE NOT Skittles Oct 2022 #3
It's some republican asshole that was "shocked" by the search The_Casual_Observer Oct 2022 #4
So, should we throw all laws requiring intent, knowledge, or belief off the books? Jim__ Oct 2022 #5
This is beyond stupid Genki Hikari Oct 2022 #11
he's a doddering 88 year old fuck. Ignore him. CurtEastPoint Oct 2022 #6
Ty! He should go back to Cali Duppers Oct 2022 #10
Can't fix stupid & it's rampant in red hellhole TN SheltieLover Oct 2022 #7
"red hellhole TN" Duppers Oct 2022 #8
No it doesn't, but given the huge % who voted for Deripaska's pal Blackburn... SheltieLover Oct 2022 #9
 

The_Casual_Observer

(27,742 posts)
4. It's some republican asshole that was "shocked" by the search
Thu Oct 13, 2022, 03:33 PM
Oct 2022

Of trump's house. The same blah blah blah crap about corrupt judges, defective search warrants and on and on. Those fuckers never give up.

Jim__

(14,426 posts)
5. So, should we throw all laws requiring intent, knowledge, or belief off the books?
Thu Oct 13, 2022, 03:42 PM
Oct 2022
The fatal flaw with indicting Trump in either case is that every crime being suggested requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt of some special mental state, such as intent, knowledge, or belief. Which will be next to impossible to prove.


Or is it just that they can't be used against republicans?
 

Genki Hikari

(1,766 posts)
11. This is beyond stupid
Fri Oct 14, 2022, 01:18 AM
Oct 2022

Actions prove intent!

You don't do certain things unless your intent is illegal.

Normal people don't spend weeks whining about a rigged election after they lose. They don't file idiotic lawsuits challenging the election with zero evidence to back them up. They don't call states threatening election officials to change the results. They don't gin up dozens of fake electors in key states to make an illegal end run around the Electoral college. They don't plot and carry out an insurrection.

People with illegal intent, namely to overthrow the government, do those things.

Even a third-tier law school grad fresh off his bar exam could prove intent when the ACTIONS these fascist seditionists committed so blatantly reveal it.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Tennessee»OMG, guest editorial in T...