Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,799 posts)
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 10:12 PM Feb 2018

Parties not voters would select nominees in future special congressional elections, according to

Parties — not voters — would select nominees in future special congressional elections, according to proposed bill

Newly elected U.S. Rep. John Curtis likely should rejoice that he ran for Congress in a special election last year. Legislators are now proposing big changes that, had they been in place then, would have defeated him.

HB344 unveiled Wednesday by Rep. Dan McCay, R-Riverton, would eliminate primaries in special elections — allowing only a general election. It most cases, it would give parties 30 days to determine their nominees in any way they choose.

For the Utah Republican Party, that would almost surely result in state convention delegates choosing the nominee. The bill’s structure and timing would not allow qualifying by collecting signatures.

Last year, ultraconservative former state Rep. Chris Herrod qualified for the primary by winning the GOP convention where delegates — who tend to be more conservative than voters in general — rejected Curtis.

Read more: https://www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2018/02/08/proposal-parties-not-voters-would-select-nominees-in-future-special-congressional-elections/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Parties not voters would select nominees in future special congressional elections, according to (Original Post) TexasTowelie Feb 2018 OP
Nothing new for Utah. Wellstone ruled Feb 2018 #1
That's an interesting point. Kittycow Feb 2018 #2
You understand where the truth is. Wellstone ruled Feb 2018 #3
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
1. Nothing new for Utah.
Wed Feb 7, 2018, 10:37 PM
Feb 2018

Pretty much the pecking order of the Priesthood and Family Linage in order to be considered for any Utah Elective Office.

Kittycow

(2,396 posts)
2. That's an interesting point.
Thu Feb 8, 2018, 03:29 AM
Feb 2018

I was just thinking how that would make me mad but sounds like it's same as it ever was.

(I live in Oregon.)

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Utah»Parties not voters woul...