Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Utah
Related: About this forumParties not voters would select nominees in future special congressional elections, according to
Parties not voters would select nominees in future special congressional elections, according to proposed billNewly elected U.S. Rep. John Curtis likely should rejoice that he ran for Congress in a special election last year. Legislators are now proposing big changes that, had they been in place then, would have defeated him.
HB344 unveiled Wednesday by Rep. Dan McCay, R-Riverton, would eliminate primaries in special elections allowing only a general election. It most cases, it would give parties 30 days to determine their nominees in any way they choose.
For the Utah Republican Party, that would almost surely result in state convention delegates choosing the nominee. The bills structure and timing would not allow qualifying by collecting signatures.
Last year, ultraconservative former state Rep. Chris Herrod qualified for the primary by winning the GOP convention where delegates who tend to be more conservative than voters in general rejected Curtis.
Read more: https://www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2018/02/08/proposal-parties-not-voters-would-select-nominees-in-future-special-congressional-elections/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1449 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Parties not voters would select nominees in future special congressional elections, according to (Original Post)
TexasTowelie
Feb 2018
OP
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)1. Nothing new for Utah.
Pretty much the pecking order of the Priesthood and Family Linage in order to be considered for any Utah Elective Office.
Kittycow
(2,396 posts)2. That's an interesting point.
I was just thinking how that would make me mad but sounds like it's same as it ever was.
(I live in Oregon.)
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)3. You understand where the truth is.
Especially on your Eastern part of your State.