Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tetrachloride

(8,478 posts)
Sat Nov 12, 2022, 04:18 PM Nov 2022

Funding said to be insufficient in WI-3

https://www.channel3000.com/it-would-have-made-the-entire-difference-democrats-wished-for-more-funding-in-3rd-congressional-district-race/

“I was heartbroken,” said William Garcia, chair of the La Crosse County Democrats. “I think we overperformed from a pundit prognostication, but I was expecting a win — I was expecting to pull it out and we came so so very close.”

Just a few weeks before the election, House Majority PAC — a national group that helps elect Democrats to the House of Representatives — pulled ad spending it had initially bought for the race. The move frustrated some Democrats in Wisconsin.

RELATED: Dems need turnout in western Wisconsin despite national group pulling ads from 3rd Congressional District

“It would have made the entire difference,” Garcia said. “One of the things that Derrick Van Orden relied on was that he was a Republican, but his specific and very extreme views were not that well known.”

Garcia said he wanted more ad space to paint that narrative of Van Orden, and in a race that did not have a debate, political experts said that political ads would fill the void.

“If I could go back in time in both the Senate race and the House race and get more national investment in these races, I think it could have made a huge difference,” said Democratic Party of Wisconsin Chair Ben Wikler.

“That’s, I think, the big lesson going forward: never write off Wisconsin Democrats, even when the chips are down,” Wikler added.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Funding said to be insufficient in WI-3 (Original Post) Tetrachloride Nov 2022 OP
We certainly need to know where the money was spent. Raven123 Nov 2022 #1
Democrats need barbtries Nov 2022 #2
age old question...money everywhere or shoot for best return on investment dembotoz Nov 2022 #3
We should have fought for that seat. milestogo Nov 2022 #4
I live in La Crosse and WI 3 had been held by a Democrat for 26 years. elocs Nov 2022 #5
 

dembotoz

(16,922 posts)
3. age old question...money everywhere or shoot for best return on investment
Sun Nov 13, 2022, 09:26 AM
Nov 2022

quite frankly i do not know

Maybe the approach needs to be different.

but getting an existing dem body to the booth is bound to be cheaper than trying to convert a red one.

but if we do not convert the reds the results do not change.

elocs

(23,066 posts)
5. I live in La Crosse and WI 3 had been held by a Democrat for 26 years.
Sun Nov 13, 2022, 06:31 PM
Nov 2022

I think Ron Kind chose to "retire" in a midterm year because he knew it would be a tough race and he might lose. I was never impressed with Brad Pfaff who had just been elected to the state senate and thought he was ready to move up to Congress. He was a weak candidate. A couple of weeks before the election he was out trying to get the rural vote. Yeah, lots of votes to be had there. My hope is that he works to become a good state senator and stops trying to move up to the next level because he's not ready.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Wisconsin»Funding said to be insuff...