Wyoming
Related: About this forumIt's Now Illegal to Kill Wolves in Wyoming
By Maddie Oatman | Wed Sep. 24, 2014 1:24 PM EDT
For the past two years, killing a wolf in Wyoming was pretty simple. In a trophy game area near the border of Yellowstone, licensed hunters were allowed to take a certain number of gray wolves. In the rest of the state, or about 80 percent of Wyoming's land, anyone could kill a limitless number of them on sight.
But that's about to change. A judge ruled Tuesday that the animals' delisting in 2012, which handed management of the species over to the Wyoming government, was "arbitrary and capricious," and that the state isn't ready to manage wolf populations on its own. The move has wolf activists breathing a sigh of relief; Wyoming's management plan, as Sierra Club's Bonnie Rice put it, could have potentially taken wolves "back to the brink of extinction." Judge Amy Berman Jackson did not challenge the previous finding that wolves had recovered and that the species "is not endangered or threatened within a significant portion of its range." But even so, her ruling means that Wyoming's wolves will again enjoy protections under the Endangered Species Act and can no longer be huntedat least in the short term.
While as many as 2 million gray wolves once roamed North America, the carnivores were nearly wiped out by humans by the early 1900s. Roughly 5,500 remain today, though an uptick in laws permitting wolf hunting in states like Wyoming, New Mexico, Montana, and Idaho all threaten to keep the animals scarce. Wyoming's hunting and "kill-on-sight" policies, for instance, meant 219 wolves were gunned down since 2012, according to Earthjustice.
In part because wolves were reintroduced in Wyoming, whether to kill or protect this predator remains a very polarizing issue in the state. Wolves kill farm animals and pets, pissing off ranchers and rural landowners alike and feeding into the attitude that the canids are just a deadly nuisance. A Facebook photo posted last year by hunting outfitters, for instance, shows a group of hunters posing with a dead wolf with blood covering its paws and mouth. The caption reads "Wyoming is FED up." Commenters responded with notes like "the only good Canadian gray wolf to me is a dead Canadian gray wolf" and "Keep on killing guys!"
http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2014/09/wolf-hunts-canceled-wyoming-endangered-species-gray-wolf
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)weasels.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)which is where I live, I have friends and family on both sides on the issue, including a rancher that lost several sheep and couple of guard dogs to wolves. I don't say much about it in mixed company and at least they stay away from it on Facebook. Personally, I think wolf reintroduction was Pittman Robertson funds well spent.
As for the hunting or killing, my principle applies to wolves as it does to killing anything else: food and defense only.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)have livestock but sure would be concerned at my dogs, and I like to know we still have wildlife, what do you do.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Last edited Fri Sep 26, 2014, 11:06 AM - Edit history (1)
but most shepherds are in the US on work visas, so that can't legally posses firearms (1968 Gun Control Act) not that they have traditionally anyway even back in the "old west". If I did, I would have to research how ranchers in Eastern Europe and Canada deal with it. I read that ranchers in Transylvania uses portable pens and alarms (along with really big dogs). Of course, that would be sheep. With cattle, I would think twice about dehorning.
My theory on livestock is the same as home, schools, country. If you have to get the gun out, your primary defenses failed.
I don't have any livestock and I grow my veggies in a greenhouse. Nothing beats picking fresh lettuce and tomatoes in January.
I know a guy in Florida who keeps coyotes and foxes away from his chickens by periodically sprinkling panther urine around the property and has a mule.