'Theresa May, Britain’s prime minister, has joined a long line of politicians who have gambled that they understood the populist wave overtaking Western politics and lost.

Thursday’s election capped a year in which the latest theory of politics in the populist era perpetually seemed to prove incorrect, as did many predictions of election outcomes. What explains this seeming inexplicability?

Populism’s individual effects, after all, have become well known. Voters oppose party establishments, scramble demographic coalitions and are more motivated by what they oppose than by what they support.

The problem is that, even among leading scholars, how these factors interact in any given election is still poorly understood.

The changes are simply too complex and too new.

Everyone knows that populism has fundamentally altered the rules of Western politics. But no one has deduced what the new rules are.

The result is that politicians and observers enter each election, whether they know it or not, merely guessing. Miscalculations and surprises have become the new normal.'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/10/world/europe/theresa-may-election-politics-populism-interpreter.html?

https://www.democraticunderground.com/1016186853

Got news for you, Mrs. May. It doesn't feel any better 7 months later.

There PM. It's what happens when you hold hands with Donald J. Maggot.

Hi,

These are the best tears since the famous Thatcher pic.

D.

Even at her worst, (which was pretty awful) Thatcher was still better than Theresa May.

That's not to say that Margaret Thatcher was wonderful (far from it!), but more to note just how abysmally poor Theresa May is as PM.

Both may have been equally nasty, but Thatcher was much more competent on a day-to-day basis.

And the one thing that Thatcher wasn't too bad on was Europe - whereas May is awful on that issue!

TiB,

Thatch might have been a better weeper, but we would need a May clip to be sure.

D.