Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(62,736 posts)
Mon Jun 1, 2020, 06:04 PM Jun 2020

Critics round on No 10 over 'ridiculous' rules for 14-day quarantine

Source: The Guardian

Critics round on No 10 over 'ridiculous' rules for 14-day quarantine

Exclusive: Opponents claim exemptions to rules could mean great economic pain for little public health benefit

Vikram Dodd and Peter Walker
Mon 1 Jun 2020 21.25 BST
Last modified on Mon 1 Jun 2020 23.15 BST

Tens of thousands of new arrivals to the UK will be able to go food shopping, change accommodation and use public transport from airports during a 14-day quarantine imposed to prevent a second wave of coronavirus, under draft plans to be laid before parliament.

The Guardian understands that about a fifth of people are expected to receive a spot-check to ensure that they are staying at the address or addresses they have provided to the authorities, but enforcement of the quarantine will be limited.

The rules, still being finalised and due to be published on Tuesday before coming into effect next week, have prompted cross-party concerns about the potentially limited impact on public health amid warnings of the severe damage that could be caused to the travel and aviation industry.

Priti Patel, the home secretary, announced on 22 May that nearly all international arrivals at UK ports, including airports, ferry ports and international rail terminals, must quarantine for 14 days from Monday 8 June. There are exemptions for health workers, scientists, lorry drivers and others.

During the coronavirus travel quarantine period, people will be allowed to leave their given address to buy food – including for pets – or medicine or to fulfil a legal obligation, it is understood. Arrivals into the country will be able to provide more than one address where they will stay for the period, sources with knowledge of the draft plans told the Guardian.

-snip-


Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/01/critics-round-on-no-10-over-ridiculous-rules-for-14-day-quarantine-coronavirus
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Critics round on No 10 over 'ridiculous' rules for 14-day quarantine (Original Post) Eugene Jun 2020 OP
One of those "go out, but don't go out" type of quarantine? mwooldri Jun 2020 #1
WWCD Richard_GB Jun 2020 #2
Just as the UK has no written Constitution, nor do these "rules" Ghost Dog Jun 2020 #3
I was supposed to fly to London tonight... a la izquierda Jun 2020 #4

mwooldri

(10,421 posts)
1. One of those "go out, but don't go out" type of quarantine?
Tue Jun 2, 2020, 02:50 AM
Jun 2020

Seems like that policy has more holes than Swiss cheese.

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
3. Just as the UK has no written Constitution, nor do these "rules"
Tue Jun 2, 2020, 07:12 AM
Jun 2020

actually constitute law promulgated through any proper procedure, as far as I can see, other than by the PM's and his advisor's whim.

This renders any enforcement if not extra-judicial, arbitrary.

a la izquierda

(11,908 posts)
4. I was supposed to fly to London tonight...
Fri Jun 5, 2020, 05:50 PM
Jun 2020

But had to delay for two weeks and will be subject to the quarantine. 🤷🏻‍♀️ Not much I can do about it though is there?
ETA: I’m flying via Dublin so I wonder how that’s going to work.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Critics round on No 10 ov...