Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Soph0571

(9,685 posts)
Sat Apr 16, 2022, 03:27 AM Apr 2022

'state-sponsored trafficking'- Peers will fight UK government's awful Rwanda plans, says Lord Dubbs

Ministers will face a fierce battle in parliament over plans to force some asylum seekers to be relocated to Rwanda, a Labour peer and former child refugee has vowed.

Alf Dubs, who was brought to Britain from Czechoslovakia on one of the Kindertransport trains in 1939, told the Guardian that the government was trying to “ride roughshod” over international agreements designed to help those seeking sanctuary.
---
“I think it’s a way of getting rid of people the government doesn’t want, dumping them in a distant African country, and they’ll have no chance of getting out of there again,” he said.

“I think it’s a breach of the 1951 Geneva conventions on refugees. You can’t just shunt them around like unwanted people.”
---
Asked if the resettlement scheme was ever likely to get off the ground, given the threat of judicial reviews and other court action, Dubs said: “I think it’s unlikely. As soon as they try and remove one person, I’m sure there’ll be a legal challenge, and I’m not sure the government will win it.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/apr/16/peers-will-fight-uk-governments-awful-rwanda-plans-says-lord-dubs

Part of me wants to believe that this is all performative - racist red rag to the red wall Brexit crowd, but I don't think it is. The Conservative Party is truly this far right now. UKIP has taken over and they are really this horrid.
I have just finished listening to Any Questions from last night - if you get the chance have a listen on BBC Sounds - David Lammy was out of this world on this subject. They have literally no shame - they need to go.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'state-sponsored trafficking'- Peers will fight UK government's awful Rwanda plans, says Lord Dubbs (Original Post) Soph0571 Apr 2022 OP
Priti Patel 'overruled' concerns of top Home Office civil servant over Rwanda asylum plan muriel_volestrangler Apr 2022 #1
My question is, why Rwanda? Why not the Isle of Mann? or the Channel Islands? mitch96 Apr 2022 #2
It would upset them; but also, the UK government is responsible for foreign policy for them muriel_volestrangler Apr 2022 #3

muriel_volestrangler

(102,483 posts)
1. Priti Patel 'overruled' concerns of top Home Office civil servant over Rwanda asylum plan
Sat Apr 16, 2022, 04:18 AM
Apr 2022
The Home Secretary has issued a rare "ministerial direction" to overrule concerns of a top civil servant regarding plans to ship some asylum seekers to Rwanda, it is reported.

It is understood Home Office civil servants raised concerns that the plan would not deliver value for money.

Multiple reports have surfaced that Priti Patel shot down those concerns and issued a ministerial direction to overrule them.
...
The UN refugee agency blasted the move as "unacceptable" and claimed the plans breached international and refugee law.

Assistant secretary-general Gillian Triggs also questioned whether it would act as a long-term deterrent, given Israel’s attempt to do something similar in Rwanda with Eritrean and Sudanese incomers saw the refugees “leave the country and start the process all over again”.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/priti-patel-overruled-concerns-top-080619620.html

And when David Davis and Andrew Mitchell call it “immoral”, “impractical”, and involving “astronomic” costs, you know it's evil.

mitch96

(14,658 posts)
2. My question is, why Rwanda? Why not the Isle of Mann? or the Channel Islands?
Sat Apr 16, 2022, 07:56 AM
Apr 2022

Could it be that would upset too many white male Christian land owners?
m

muriel_volestrangler

(102,483 posts)
3. It would upset them; but also, the UK government is responsible for foreign policy for them
Sat Apr 16, 2022, 10:32 AM
Apr 2022

and the purpose of this is to remove the unwanted foreigners from British jurisdiction and make them Somebody Else's Problem. And also, it is explicitly being sold by the government as a deterrent - "you'll never be allowed to settle in this developed country, you'll be sent to a developing country with a dodgy human rights record, a GDP per capita of about $900, and the highest population density in Africa". The Rwandan president may also be one of the few people who'd agree to this.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»'state-sponsored traffick...