Campaigns

dutch777

(3,456 posts) Thu Dec 7, 2023, 07:42 PM Dec 2023

Another Repug in the WH, especially with a GOP Congress, is scary. But who is the LEAST dangerous GOP candidate?

I'll put my two cents in, and it would be Christy. I wish I could say Haley as I want to see a woman in the Presidency in my lifetime, albeit not a Repug if I could help it, but she seems just off in a way that is disturbing. I do think she is in the ONLY GOPer that has a real sense of the dangers we face in foreign policy but I think Christy is teachable with the right staffers.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Another Repug in the WH, especially with a GOP Congress, is scary. But who is the LEAST dangerous GOP candidate? (Original Post) dutch777 Dec 2023 OP

Yes, christie. elleng Dec 2023 #1

Would have to be Chris Christie. Romney would work, but isn't running. sinkingfeeling Dec 2023 #2

They are all concerning, especially if GOPers control Congress. Silent Type Dec 2023 #3

There is MOMFUDSKI Dec 2023 #4

No... Think. Again. Dec 2023 #5

The Lord of Bridge and Beach is indistinguishable from the rest of them. Marcuse Dec 2023 #6

Chris Christie Deep State Witch Dec 2023 #7

Christie Karadeniz Dec 2023 #8

ModerateUnderground Jan 2024 #9

I would consider them all dangerous. ificandream Jan 2024 #10

They are all the same damn thing. There is "no less dangerous" as there is not a "little bit pregnant". Autumn Jan 2024 #11

elleng

(136,043 posts)

1. Yes, christie.

Reply to dutch777 (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2023, 07:43 PM

Dec 2023

sinkingfeeling

(52,985 posts)

2. Would have to be Chris Christie. Romney would work, but isn't running.

Reply to dutch777 (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2023, 07:48 PM

Dec 2023

Silent Type

(6,652 posts)

3. They are all concerning, especially if GOPers control Congress.

Reply to dutch777 (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2023, 07:48 PM

Dec 2023

MOMFUDSKI

(7,080 posts)

4. There is

Reply to dutch777 (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2023, 07:50 PM

Dec 2023

No Such Animal.

Think. Again.

(17,904 posts)

5. No...

Reply to dutch777 (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2023, 07:54 PM

Dec 2023

...individual repugs can't stand on their own.

Putting another one in the White House means giving our nation over to a malicious cabal intent on junking everything and selling it off for scrap.

Marcuse

(8,003 posts)

6. The Lord of Bridge and Beach is indistinguishable from the rest of them.

Reply to dutch777 (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2023, 08:09 PM

Dec 2023

Apologies to any offended ophidians.

Deep State Witch

(11,248 posts)

7. Chris Christie

Reply to dutch777 (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2023, 08:18 PM

Dec 2023

I think that he learned his lesson after almost dying from COVID because of the Orange Horror.

Karadeniz

(23,414 posts)

8. Christie

Reply to dutch777 (Original post)

Thu Dec 7, 2023, 10:57 PM

Dec 2023

ModerateUnderground

(11 posts)

Reply to dutch777 (Original post)

Sun Jan 14, 2024, 10:33 AM

Jan 2024

Last edited Sun Jan 14, 2024, 11:15 AM - Edit history (1)

ificandream

(10,507 posts)

10. I would consider them all dangerous.

Reply to dutch777 (Original post)

Mon Jan 15, 2024, 06:47 PM

Jan 2024

They're all RepUGHs, remember. They side with the rich. They hate progress. They hate minorities. They love Fox/right-wing sham media. We don't need any of that. Hopefully, with Trump, they're on the way out.

Autumn

(46,280 posts)

11. They are all the same damn thing. There is "no less dangerous" as there is not a "little bit pregnant".

Reply to dutch777 (Original post)

Sat Jan 27, 2024, 11:37 AM

Jan 2024

Please don't try to normalize any fucking republican. They are all dangerous and disgusting creatures. EVERY. DAMN. ONE. OF. THEM>.

Reply to this discussion