Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Election Reform
Related: About this forumBradBlog: EAC Finds ES&S Paper Ballot Scanners Used Across the Country Fail to Count Votes Correctly
For first time, compromised federal agency admits their previous certification was deeply flawed...
By Brad Friedman on 12/23/2011
snip
A new finding by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission --- a rare finding, first of its kind, in fact, as the woeful EAC has never before taken the time to investigate and report on serious failures of e-voting systems that it has previously blessed with federal certification --- reveals that ES&S paper ballot optical-scan systems used in a bunch of large swing states, result in machines freezing during elections, failing to log system events correctly, and, perhaps most troubling, ballots being misread and votes being lost entirely.
The EAC's "Formal Investigation Report" follows on April 2010 revelations by the Cleveland Plain Dealer that some 10% of Cuyahoga County (Cleveland)'s EAC-certified ES&S Precinct Count Optical Scanner and Unity 3.2.0.0 tabulator voting systems failed in pre-election testing last year.
The paper ballot scanning computers were purchased as a replacement for the 100% unverifiable Diebold touch-screen systems used previously in Ohio's largest county, after a massive analysis of all of the state's e-voting systems, overseen by former Sec. of State Jennifer Brunner (D), revealed serious security issues and other major flaws in the touch-screen voting machines used there and in many other states.
Relatedly, Diebold's own paper ballot optical-scan system has similarly been found, in the past, to include a flaw which results in votes being lost entirely, though the EAC never issued a warning about that system, to our knowledge, even after it led to hundreds of votes going uncounted in at least one election in Northern California (and lord only knows how many elsewhere that the same system is used.)
snip/much, much more
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9006
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2649 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BradBlog: EAC Finds ES&S Paper Ballot Scanners Used Across the Country Fail to Count Votes Correctly (Original Post)
Wilms
Dec 2011
OP
annabanana
(52,791 posts)1. Anyone got Andy Stephenson's VVPB graphic with that adorable doggie?
I've been thinking about him a lot lately.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)2. Ballot was the doggie's name I believe...
annabanana
(52,791 posts)4. thank you so much. . . .N/T
It took just 10 years for the agency formed by HAVA to uncover the fact that the machines are not worthy of being used to count our votes. Just 10 years....
We're on a roll... Finally... Heck, ya think maybe because a democratic administration is heading up the government now, that they decided it was safe to issue such a damning report?
Look to see the EAC get slammed even harder now by the pubbies.