Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Wed Apr 15, 2015, 09:10 PM Apr 2015

Velvet REvolution--Virginia wireless voting machines can be hacked with a smart phone

http://elections.virginia.gov/webdocs/VotingEquipReport/2.pdf

According to a new report by the Virginia Department of Elections, its ubiquitous electronic WINVote machines are a threat to elections because they have wireless capabilities and no paper ballots. Incredibly, investigators were able to demonstrate that the machines could be accessed, and votes potentially manipulated, with a mere smartphone. The Department of Elections says their preliminary findings raise “grave concerns” about the security risks associated with the WINVote touchscreen machines. As part of the review, the Virginia Information Technology Agency (VITA) evaluated the system. VITA recommended discontinuing their use and replacing them with “a system less vulnerable to a local or remote cyberattack.”

We have, for more than a decade, been warning about these dangers, and even provided similar touch-screen systems to scientists at Princeton who were able to hack them in less than a minute's time, change votes and propagate a virus that could be passed from machine to machine with little likelihood of election officials or the public ever knowing it. We also provided an electronic voting machine to scientists at the Argonne National Laboratory, which found that many such systems can be hacked by remote control from a half mile away.

In the 2013 election in Virginia, Terry McAuliffe narrowly won the governorship after leading in the polls by seven points. The same year the Democratic Attorney General nominee reportedly won his race by fewer than 1,000 votes out of more than 2 million cast. Both elections saw widespread problems with voting machines across the state. By the way, the "WIN" in WINvote means "Wireless Information Network.”

We continue to insist on a hand-marked paper ballot for every vote cast. Our country’s failed experiment with unverifiable electronic voting systems must come to an end.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Velvet REvolution--Virginia wireless voting machines can be hacked with a smart phone (Original Post) eridani Apr 2015 OP
Kick (nt) Kurovski Jul 2015 #1
Amen!!! Stevepol Aug 2015 #2

Stevepol

(4,234 posts)
2. Amen!!!
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 08:42 PM
Aug 2015

We need to insist that we have to have verified voting. We have to be able to verify the vote.

I know this is only a partial answer, but it's something that is readily understood by anybody in any political party. It implies that we have to have paper. I don't trust the little print-outs from the touchscreens, but maybe we might have to make-do with them. But we have to insist and DEMAND that we have VERIFIED ELECTIONS. If we keep insisting, everybody constantly, under every circumstance, in every situation, regardless of the topic. Keep the Repubs on their heels. How can they refuse to acknowledge this and still pretend to be fair and impartial, etc.? Unless the vote can be VERIFIED, you have NO DEMOCRACY.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»Velvet REvolution--Virgin...