Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(62,658 posts)
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 10:47 AM Oct 2017

U.S. Supreme Court justices divided in major voting rights case

Source: Reuters

#SUPREME COURT OCTOBER 3, 2017 / 10:13 AM / UPDATED 29 MINUTES AGO

U.S. Supreme Court justices divided in major voting rights case

Andrew Chung
5 MIN READ

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Supreme Court justices on Tuesday appeared divided over whether to issue a ruling that would curb the ability of politicians to draw electoral districts purely on partisan lines in a major voting rights case out of Wisconsin.

Some of the conservative justices questioned whether Democratic voters challenging the maps drawn by Republicans in Wisconsin had legal standing to bring the case. But the potential swing vote, conservative Justice Anthony Kennedy, asked tough questions of the state’s lawyers.

The liberal justices appeared more eager for the court to rule that partisan electoral maps could violate the U.S. Constitution. The justices heard about an hour of arguments in the case.

Wisconsin is appealing a lower court’s ruling that the electoral map devised by state Republicans had such extreme partisan aims that it violated the constitutional rights of voters.

-snip-


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-election/u-s-supreme-court-justices-divided-in-major-voting-rights-case-idUSKCN1C81P2
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Supreme Court justices divided in major voting rights case (Original Post) Eugene Oct 2017 OP
I am closely following this case Gothmog Oct 2017 #1
I am not holding out a lot of hope rurallib Oct 2017 #2
Why wouldn't Dem voters have legal standing in this case? procon Oct 2017 #3
The standing issue may just be a way to dodge the underlying question FBaggins Oct 2017 #4
This is a very big deal since other states will use it as BigmanPigman Oct 2017 #5

rurallib

(63,201 posts)
2. I am not holding out a lot of hope
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 10:55 AM
Oct 2017

there was a reason the Repugs blocked Garland. This case is one of the reasons.

At his core, Kennedy is a Republican.

procon

(15,805 posts)
3. Why wouldn't Dem voters have legal standing in this case?
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 11:42 AM
Oct 2017

Is the court saying Democrats can be legally treated as second class citizens and have their voting rights diminished while Republicans get to tilt the scales in their favor?

I tried google, but there's no discussion or explanation about why Republicans get preferential treatment. Anyone have an idea about why Dems wouldn't have legal standing?

FBaggins

(27,714 posts)
4. The standing issue may just be a way to dodge the underlying question
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 12:43 PM
Oct 2017

It isn't that the republicans get preferential treatment from a standing perspective... because there isn't a group of Republican voters that were found to have standing while a group of Democratic voters were not. "The Republicans" in this case is really "The Wisconsin Legislature" - which of course has standing in a challenge to a law that they wrote.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»U.S. Supreme Court justic...