Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Election Reform
Related: About this forumLetting people vote at home increases voter turnout. Heres proof.
Vote by mail increases turnout https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/letting-people-vote-at-home-increases-voter-turnout-heres-proof/2018/01/26/d637b9d2-017a-11e8-bb03-722769454f82_story.html?utm_term=.6b88a8db0408
The challenge in trying to evaluate the impact of vote at home on turnout is that theres never a control group. Turnout rates in the states where everyone can vote at home Oregon, Washington and Colorado have increased since the system was adopted, and theyre now among the highest in the country. But because elections are complicated, and each states demographics are unique, its hard to prove that vote at home is the cause.
So Pantheon Analytics did the next best thing. The firm looked at voter files the records of individual voters kept by state elections officials in Colorado in 2014 and compared them with the predictions of a respected voter turnout model created by the Democratic-leaning consulting firm Clarity Campaign Labs. Turnout models use publicly available voter file information age, sex, voting history combined with consumer data to generate a probability score for each registered voter.
?uuid=4bxXTgLAEeidMdcs942-7g
....Vote at home clearly seems to have pushed young people and infrequent voters into the electorate exactly what our ailing system needs. Democrats should be fighting tooth and nail to get it implemented wherever possible. But the partisanship results are hazy enough that Republicans shouldnt be too scared: It looks like these low-frequency voters tend to be less partisan and therefore more up for grabs.
Besides, boosting turnout in lower-profile elections would be good for the long-term health of both parties. Low turnout may help Republican candidates prevail in general elections, but it also empowers the right-wing fringe, leading to a party that, once in power, is incapable of governing as the GOPs inability to prevent a shutdown, despite unified control of the federal government, recently illustrated.
So Pantheon Analytics did the next best thing. The firm looked at voter files the records of individual voters kept by state elections officials in Colorado in 2014 and compared them with the predictions of a respected voter turnout model created by the Democratic-leaning consulting firm Clarity Campaign Labs. Turnout models use publicly available voter file information age, sex, voting history combined with consumer data to generate a probability score for each registered voter.
?uuid=4bxXTgLAEeidMdcs942-7g
....Vote at home clearly seems to have pushed young people and infrequent voters into the electorate exactly what our ailing system needs. Democrats should be fighting tooth and nail to get it implemented wherever possible. But the partisanship results are hazy enough that Republicans shouldnt be too scared: It looks like these low-frequency voters tend to be less partisan and therefore more up for grabs.
Besides, boosting turnout in lower-profile elections would be good for the long-term health of both parties. Low turnout may help Republican candidates prevail in general elections, but it also empowers the right-wing fringe, leading to a party that, once in power, is incapable of governing as the GOPs inability to prevent a shutdown, despite unified control of the federal government, recently illustrated.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 2206 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Letting people vote at home increases voter turnout. Heres proof. (Original Post)
Gothmog
Jan 2018
OP
News at 11: Making it easier to do something results in more of that thing being done. n/t
PoliticAverse
Jan 2018
#2
Eliot Rosewater
(32,536 posts)1. GOP hates voting. So they will fight this.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)2. News at 11: Making it easier to do something results in more of that thing being done. n/t
safeinOhio
(34,090 posts)3. This is part of making every state...
..A Right-To-Vote State.
It will have to be done in each state. Sure beats Right-to-Work state laws.