Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Election Reform
Related: About this forumU.S. Supreme Court blocks redrawing of Ohio, Michigan electoral maps
LBN thread: U.S. Supreme Court grants Ohio's request to delay new map in gerrymandering case
______________________________________________________________________
Source: Reuters
SUPREME COURT MAY 24, 2019 / 3:00 PM / UPDATED 15 MINUTES AGO
U.S. Supreme Court blocks redrawing of Ohio, Michigan electoral maps
Andrew Chung, Lawrence Hurley
4 MIN READ
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Supreme Court on Friday blocked lower court rulings ordering Republican legislators in Michigan and Ohio to redraw U.S. congressional maps ahead of the 2020 elections, dealing a blow to Democrats who had argued that the electoral districts were intended to unlawfully diminish their political clout.
The justices granted requests from Republican lawmakers in both states to put those decisions on hold, halting further action in the cases and the need to rework electoral district boundaries. The justices did not provide any explanation for their brief orders.
The lower courts found that the electoral maps in the two states had been drawn to entrench Republicans in power by manipulating boundaries in a way that reduced the voting clout of Democrats - a practice known as partisan gerrymandering - in violation of the U.S. Constitution.
While both disputes involve U.S. House of Representatives districts in the two states, the Michigan case challenges districts in the state legislature as well.
The decisions in Michigan and Ohio that were put on hold by the justices were the latest rulings by federal courts determining that electoral maps designed by a states majority party unconstitutionally undermined the rights of voters who tend to support the other party.
-snip-
U.S. Supreme Court blocks redrawing of Ohio, Michigan electoral maps
Andrew Chung, Lawrence Hurley
4 MIN READ
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Supreme Court on Friday blocked lower court rulings ordering Republican legislators in Michigan and Ohio to redraw U.S. congressional maps ahead of the 2020 elections, dealing a blow to Democrats who had argued that the electoral districts were intended to unlawfully diminish their political clout.
The justices granted requests from Republican lawmakers in both states to put those decisions on hold, halting further action in the cases and the need to rework electoral district boundaries. The justices did not provide any explanation for their brief orders.
The lower courts found that the electoral maps in the two states had been drawn to entrench Republicans in power by manipulating boundaries in a way that reduced the voting clout of Democrats - a practice known as partisan gerrymandering - in violation of the U.S. Constitution.
While both disputes involve U.S. House of Representatives districts in the two states, the Michigan case challenges districts in the state legislature as well.
The decisions in Michigan and Ohio that were put on hold by the justices were the latest rulings by federal courts determining that electoral maps designed by a states majority party unconstitutionally undermined the rights of voters who tend to support the other party.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-gerrymandering/u-s-supreme-court-blocks-redrawing-of-ohio-michigan-electoral-maps-idUSKCN1SU292
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Supreme Court blocks redrawing of Ohio, Michigan electoral maps (Original Post)
Eugene
May 2019
OP
elleng
(136,689 posts)1. 'The justices granted requests from Republican lawmakers in both states to put those decisions on
hold.'
Temporary, Procedural decision.
UncleTomsEvilBrother
(954 posts)2. I always wonder...
...why these stories don't always post how each Justice voted. I mean, the headlines politicize everything else. Why don't they show how the individual Justices vote? They have no problem at all writing, "Trump reverses an Obama-era policy," making sure to keep the headline as political as possible.