I don't think either thing is likely, but given the lawless nature of many judges and a majority of the Supreme Court, the chances are non-zero.

On the plus side, the more likely miscarriage is being denied the 90 (?) million dollars from the campaign fund. The loss of that would sting, but not be fatal. Didn't Vice President Harris raise three times that over the weekend?

I think we are dealing with plaintiffs and judges who have no interest in the law or the constitution whatsoever.

At the core, a political party has the right to determine how they choose their candidate. The justices know a ruling that would keep her off a ballot, or some ballots, would spark massive civil unrest. While true that some of the justices have demonstrated a distain for actual legal rulings they don't like, I don't see this being even a remote possibility.

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/07/experts-delegates-free-to-pick-democratic-nominee/

I think my main point was that right now we need to have a mindset that if they take away our vote that’s the end of it, everything stops, all work stops, all bill paying stops, and everyone goes to the street in a way that would scare even people like Alito and Thomas.

These fascists need to believe how bad it would be and I don’t know how we make that clear to them.

Ugh, repeatedly the SC has upheld the right of the party to nominate who they want, etc. This SC clearly is willing to ignore that.

... anti-American authoritarian control would spark an unprecedented write-in movement for freedom. She could even get some of those flat earthers on board

Back to our narrative, she punched the bully right in the face.

A Republican Secretary of State can always claim signatures don't match or they didn't dot an 'i' or something.

Then a corrupt judge can just delay efforts to force them to it back on.

I don't think they will actually do stuff like this. They want some delay and confusion but they don't actually want Harris off the ballot. They just want enough chaos for the background justification to invalidate the entire election when they lose.

to the SC and others that this action will end the country.

I am also wondering how "write-in" could also be prevented, illegally of course. EVERYTHING they do is illegal. Pretty much everything nowadays anyway.

Live and learn. It's news to me, but there are some states that don't allow write-ins, or only allow write-ins who are registered by some process. I wonder if there have been legal challenges, and if so how they were possibly resolved to prohibit counting a write-in?

https://ballotpedia.org/Write-in_candidate

I am sure the evil people behind Project 2025 are working on ways to make this happen....

But the more relevant question is, is it probable?

I guess we’ll find out- there may be some attempts at lawsuits, but I’m not that worried that they will prevail.

could look into his new trunk of full-immunity powers and come up with a solution should push come to shove.

At least make sure the FEC is monitoring these states trying to screw the voters the most. Maybe assign FEC monitors at the polls. How can we trust these red state morons bent on fixing an election to do the right thing? They hide under the cover of accusing everyone else of doing exactly what they are doing. A light needs to be shined all over them constantly or our democracy doesn't have a chance.

If it doesn't go along with their fascist agenda, it's unconstitutional.