Election Reform
Related: About this forumU of TX El Paso prof says PREP is manipulating vote count in Mexico.
He says the correlation of 40+ data points was perfect for three hours last night, which shouldn't be possible. (I have no idea what that means.)
Here is the data he bases his conclusion on:
http://www.el5antuario.org/2012/07/reportan-grafica-espejo-entre-jvm-y.html
This blogger says the mirroring results shouldn't be possible and he points out that this is also what was done in 2006.
I've been very concerned that electronic election fraud has been exported around the world.
demosincebirth
(12,740 posts)johnsolaris
(220 posts)Mexico has never recovered from the PRI years. I have had several friends work in Mexico & love the country & the people.
However, the way of doing business was completely corrupted by the PRI. Bribery & corruption is common place & environmental laws,
If there are any at all are ignored. Outside the cities there are places that are beautiful, but are threatened & may disappear soon.
Good luck if the PRI returns.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)site was under continuous attacking during the vote AND it took in hundreds of trouble reports.
http://www.democracynow.org/2012/7/2/after_election_mexico_poised_for_return
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)any college professors will pay any attention to the 2012 election results?
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)or at Mark Crispin Miller's blog. Maybe a handful of other places.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)Jul
2
Se confirma fraude, Anonymous se infiltra a la base de datos del PREP, y dice que AMLO llevaría un 41%... EPN 33%.
(Anonymous hacks PREP database; says AMLO should be at 41%, EPN at 33%)
Anonymous hackea al IFE, Todo sea por la democracia
In Uncategorized on 2 julio 2012 at 12:09 pm
Cuando la democracia funciona, los amos de México cometen fraude: compran votos, duplican papeletas, programan el software del IFE con un 4.7 de ventaja a EPN, transcriben equivocadamente los resultados de las actas de casillas, razuran los padrones, limitan las papeletas en distritos de la oposición, etc., etc.. Ante la abrumadora cantidad de evidencia ciudadana, -EL FRAUDE del IFE es innegable-.
When democracy works, the masters of Mexico commit fraud: buying votes, duplicate ballots, program the software with a 4.7 IFE advantage ahead of EPN, "accidentally" transcribe wrong polling place results, you dress up the pimp, limit the ballots in districts of the opposition, and so on., etc. .. Given the overwhelming amount of evidence citizen-IFE FRAUD is undeniable
http://armakdeodelot.blogspot.mx/2012/07/se-confirma-fraude-anonymous-se.html
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)Anonymous Hispano @anonopshispano
Marchan integrantes de #YoSoy132 hacia el Monumento a la Revolución - http://ow.ly/bYxIC #PeñaNietoPresidente del fraude.
https://twitter.com/anonopshispano/status/219967070429921280
http://elnuevomexicano.mx/el-pais/marchan-integrantes-de-yosoy132-hacia-el-monumento-a-la-revolucion/
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Also the statistics by PREP matched exit polls very closely, so they'll have to explain that Grupo Musofsky, Reforma, Televisa and Excelsuor, all ran their own polls, were in it.
For the record I have seen stats like that in European elections and the US. So are we getting wide spread fraud? Perhaps.
But this would mean such a wide spread conspiracy it boggles the mind.
My opinion, PRD/PT would have done better not to run Obrador, he left a really bitter taste in people's mouths.
One more thing, actually two
1.- Peña Nieto went into the elections leading all polls anywhere from five to ten points. This is considered reliable data in most elections.
2.- Did the PRI / Parido verde alliance, Alianza por México also steal the House?
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)El PREP resta votos para el "Movimiento Progresista" Hay muchas pruebas de esto. (PREP subtracts votes from "Movimiento Progresista". There are many instances of this.)
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=295883160510603&set=a.181109608654626.37027.181102471988673&type=1&ref=nf
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)There can be a direct correlation in a two-party vote, approaching 1.0, but in a three-party race a direct correlation of two parties without a correlation in the third case is inddeed improbable.