I'm banned for life from advertising on Meta. Because I teach Python.
https://lerner.co.il/2023/10/19/im-banned-for-life-from-advertising-on-meta-because-i-teach-python/Looong story short:
Python is a programming language, and Pandas is: a fast, powerful, flexible and easy to use open source data analysis and manipulation tool, built on top of the Python programming language.
OK now that that's clear:
Thats right: I teach courses in Python and Pandas. Never mind that the first is a programming language and the second is a library for data analysis in Python. Metas AI system noticed that I was talking about Python and Pandas, assumed that I was talking about the animals (not the technology), and banned me. The appeal that I asked for wasnt reviewed by a human, but was reviewed by another bot, which (not surprisingly) made a similar assessment.
...
The bottom line seems to be that Metas AI made a mistake, a big one. (You can be sure that Ill be using this example when I teach courses on machine learning.) The fact that both the original judgment and the appeal were handed by AI is pretty ridiculous.
But even more absurd is the fact that because I didnt react to their ban within a certain amount of time, (Meta has a data-retention policy of only 180 days) there now seems to be no way for me to undo it. Which means that when I start to advertise my courses again and Im actually planning to do so in the near future Meta wont be seeing any of my money, whereas companies like Google, who seem to employ at least some humans in their advertising department will.
And good luck finding humans at Google et. al.
487 comments at Hacker News. Just one sample.
A COMPUTER
CAN NEVER BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE
THEREFORE A COMPUTER MUST NEVER
MAKE A MANAGEMENT DECISION
IBM slide, 1979
lapfog_1
(30,214 posts)often making use of the Pandas library.
It does a credible job as long as I can describe what I want exactly.
So... AI knows that Python and Pandas are related to software. Ot at least ChatGPT3 and Bard do.
I wonder what is up with Meta???
usonian
(14,079 posts)EYESORE 9001
(27,531 posts)but it looks to me - an interested observer - like Meta is deliberately screwing with Pandas by alerting on the word Python. Perhaps Im displaying my ignorance, but this seems like a relatively simple fix
if they wanted to fix it, that is.
Im not a lawyer either, but it further appears that Pandas has a case for suing Meta. For what? I dont know. Thats the beauty of armchair lawyerin. I can inject my personal assessment of right and wrong into business law without regard for validity.
I wonder how Monty Python fares on the Meta platform? Wouldnt Meta have written code to distinguish? There must be thousands of similar situations involving words like that, hence my earlier mention of this being deliberate.
Silent Type
(6,770 posts)Name it Love, Hope, or anything close to ignore hassles.
usonian
(14,079 posts)That matches everything but ruby at times, so it has to be qualified heavily.
And forget about "C" entirely.
EYESORE 9001
(27,531 posts)Obviously, Metas overbearing practices are influencing peoples decisions based on whether they appease Metas corporate sensibilities.
WWZT
What Would Zuck Think?