It's obviously tearing the Republicans up to refuse the MIC another war we can't win but which will make them richer.

Tapdancing while twisting oneself into a pretzel, that's going to leave a mark.

And an Obama supporter. It is ridiculous. They are so intent on discrediting this President they will give up the war profits!

"traitor" "You don't support the troops" "Friend of Assad" type talk from 2002-3?

Maybe that is why I'm so pissed off at what I see now!

Last edited Sat Aug 31, 2013, 08:59 PM - Edit history (1)

The only countries I know with really big stakes in this are Turkey and Jordan. They're taking the refugees in, so is Iraq.

Lebanon may be doing so as well. But Turkey is the one who has been calling for Assad to be gone for a long time. And they are in NATO, just like the US and France and a number of other nations.

I think the best solution is for the UN to get in there. If the Russians don't trust the USA or other nations to treat their friend Assad well, they could send in their people along with other nationals.

The goal is to stop the killing. Calling the UN is the simplest solution. IMO.

to one and he responded with some bs about how they got rid of saddam and then blamed Obama for Iraq not being such a great place.

And he ended that war, thank God, Goddess, Allah, Buddha, whoever!

than Syria, which was horrific in itself.

It's Russia arming the ME with chemical weapons and helping Iran with its nuclear program that's the issue here. Not only that but Russia is also very influential in Yemen and Somalia, two countries who just happen to have successful Al Qaeda groups. There's a reason for that. Russia can and does use AQ to its advantage when it wants to, as long as it's targeting the West.

And what is they expect to get that they could not get openly by trade?

since OBL's death. The last alert was evidence of OBL's successor in Pakistan attempting to assert control over AQAP in Yemen. Some don't think he can do it since AQAP has been the most active and most deadly group of all. And the best organized.

Who knows which group attacked Russia and if they're still in existence even. There are other Islamist groups in the Stans that have had specific issues with Russia for centuries.

That gives Putin the option of supplying AQ in other regions which don't directly threaten Russia. Like Yemen and Somalia. Russia is also good at flooding an area with arms that just happen to wind up in the hands of terrorists. And it is notorious for not accounting for arms traded. The more business it does in a region the more likely it is to be able to sneak shipments through.

who oppose any intervention of any kind. It's a civil war and not our business. but, I think that's where they'd be wrong.

As usual President Obama is looking at the whole picture and the future and yes dimensional chess does come into it.

I wish him all the luck in the world with the heavy responsibility of his job and to his National Security Team. May they do it the exact right thing for all the people involved.

Putin and his merry band of traitors rot in hell.

they belong.

Which reminds me.. I couldn't believe it.. someone actually whined on a "John Kerry said no war" thread that "he disrespected Putin!"!!?

I asked.. "who the heck is putin to you?' "is that you snowden?"

times I wonder which fucking country I'm in. Seriously. Keep checking my keyboard to see if I have Cyrillic turned on and forgot or something. Maybe wound up in Putin Lovers Underground by accident.

Fucking sucks. I'm telling anybody that will listen. He is antisemitic, homophobic, bigoted against anybody who's not Russian really. But he'll tolerate the ME and African Muslims because of what he perceives as their mutual views on homosexuality and Jews and Americans. And he wants control over the region.

It does suck. Putin is really bad news. I think we all would rather have the President focused on domestic/social issues (which he is excellent on) than the middle east but it comes with the job. I feel much better knowing Obama rather than a Bush, Romney or Palin type is making these hard decisions.

That this will turn into a war between the US and Russia.

They at least have to know now that their expansion into the ME has been noted. The really frightening thing is that it's not just there.

they got the chance to live in Russia so they could be closer to their ideal dictator and get away from lean mean big bad Obama!



http://theobamadiary.com/2013/08/31/night-owl-jukebox-2/#comments

fresh

an OP. :p

who looks at that picture and also thinks of James Earl Jones? I've seen the exact same smile on him too. Love it!

He is weighing all the options and possible outcomes. And that is very refreshing after the cowboy diplomacy of Bush.

I wish him luck under these difficult circumstances which are NOT of his making.

And the conservatives have no relevant answers about why they are so hypocritical when their support of that multiyear death spiral and illegal invasion and takeover of a country was unequivocal, now they can't even remotely support an effort to retaliate for the use of chemical weapons.

They should be full on supporting this one. Full on. A few of them actually are consistent, and their criticism is that Obama should have acted long ago.

But he waited for evidence. People willing to invade a country because it might have chemical and nuclear weapons should be all for invading one where it is not only confirmed they have them, but they've actually used them.

During the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, it was common to read: Yes, this Middle Eastern ruler is a vile dictator, he's used poison gas on his own people, he's engineered repression at home, he's hostile to Israel... but we can't be the world's policeman, and all these factors put together don't justify U.S. military intervention in a country that's no threat to us.

Some people who took that view during the Bush years are now willing to support U.S. military intervention under similar circumstances.

Let us not pretend that partisans on our side are always pure of heart. It's often true that, in politics, where you stand depends on where you sit.

I personally don't think that this situation demands a military response. I do agree with you, though, that with Bush, McCain, or Romney in the White House making the decision, many of these born-again peaceniks would be happy to support anything that "their" President wanted, up to and including an invasion by ground troops. I would rather have the decision made by Obama than by any of those clowns.

There is no excuse, none, for the US to bomb Syria. It will do nothing but cause more innocent deaths and stoke Middle East opinion against the US. The very notion of getting involved in Syria's civil war is idiotic.

and knowledge over those on the internet.

As you should have read in the OP.. this is posted in the Barack Obama Group. there's plenty of other places online for claim "iditotic".. just not here. This is for members of our group.

Those who think the president just might be wrong about something aren't supposed to mention it here. Got it. Well, before I go, just let me reiterate that a strike on Syria would be idiotic. Fucked up. Moronic.

I don't give a damn how much you worship President Obama. Maybe you should think for yourself about whether or not we should bomb another country and start another war. Either that or go to the local recruiting office and volunteer to help out in the next war.

than you or you get all insulting and claim you're the only one who knows anything about anything.

And, yes, you should have read the whole OP and "noticed" that this is a Group for members only and is off limits to those who want to rage on this Admin. you have the whole internet for that. We're here to discuss what is going on.. not what isn't.

Seems to apply here ???