Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(62,646 posts)
Fri Aug 14, 2020, 07:48 PM Aug 2020

Firm Helping Run Federal Database Refuses Senators' Questions

Source: New York Times

LIVE UPDATES updated 7 minutes ago

Coronavirus Live Updates: Firm Helping Run Federal Database Refuses Senators’ Questions

-snip-

The manager of the Trump administration’s new virus database refuses Senate questioning, citing a nondisclosure agreement.

The private health care technology vendor that is helping to manage the Trump administration’s new coronavirus database has refused to answer questions from top Senate Democrats about its $10.2 million contract, saying it signed a nondisclosure agreement with the federal Department of Health and Human Services.

In a letter obtained by The New York Times, dated Aug. 3, a lawyer for the Pittsburgh-based TeleTracking Technologies cited the nondisclosure agreement in refusing to provide information about its process for collecting and sharing data; its proposal to the government; communications with White House staff or other officials; and any other information related to the award.

A spokeswoman for Department of Health and Human Services said members of Congress should direct their inquiries to the government, not the company. But Senator Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Senate Health Committee, sent a letter to the agency in June seeking similar information and has not received a reply, her office said.

The arrangement was unusual, Jessica Tillipman, an assistant dean at George Washington University Law School who teaches about government contracts and anti-corruption, said in an interview.

-snip-


Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/14/world/covid-19-coronavirus.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage#link-538de6a7
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Firm Helping Run Federal Database Refuses Senators' Questions (Original Post) Eugene Aug 2020 OP
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE PAID FOR THAT SYSTEM AND THE DATA. IT'S OURS. n/t CousinIT Aug 2020 #1
This!👆 SheltieLover Aug 2020 #2
NDA - Non Disclosure Agreement,..... magicarpet Aug 2020 #3
This is why privatizing government is so encouraged by some. magicarpet Aug 2020 #9
NDA? for a contract with the US government? This cannot possibly be legal. And, don't tell Karadeniz Aug 2020 #4
+1 n/t Laelth Aug 2020 #7
Jail those MFs until they answer RainCaster Aug 2020 #5
Great way to run a democracy, NDA's forever. NT enough Aug 2020 #6
It seems the Repubes believe they will be in charge forever. Baked Potato Aug 2020 #8
So the Executive Branch cabinet is shaping up as a parallel run corporate system. I see now. ancianita Aug 2020 #10
Non-disclosure agreements Cosmo Blues Aug 2020 #11

magicarpet

(16,504 posts)
3. NDA - Non Disclosure Agreement,.....
Fri Aug 14, 2020, 07:55 PM
Aug 2020

Now where did that nefarious plan come from ? It sounds familiar.

Where oh where ????

(DJTSR)

magicarpet

(16,504 posts)
9. This is why privatizing government is so encouraged by some.
Fri Aug 14, 2020, 08:39 PM
Aug 2020

Open government, checks and balances, fact finding or investigative committees are pretty much shutdown or strictly limited to the information they are permitted to gather.

A private contractor deems their proposals, contracts, and business dealings with government are all proprietary information.

Proprietary information, also known as a trade secret, is information a company wishes to keep confidential. It can also be a nifty way to conceal or cover up wrong doing.

The taxpayer pays for the services of the privatized contractor or vendor but can not review the relationship or results because the info is conveniently deemed top secret by the contractor.

Think DRE electronic voting machines. No one can audit the honesty or accuracy of the voting equipment or whether it was fraudulently programmed to throw an election. Because the voting equipment, tabulators, hardware, software, and operating programs are deemed proprietary information. The voting machine manufacturer's servicing personnel are the only ones authorized to program, calibrate and service that equipment. Because the inside workings are considered top secret.

Karadeniz

(23,416 posts)
4. NDA? for a contract with the US government? This cannot possibly be legal. And, don't tell
Fri Aug 14, 2020, 07:55 PM
Aug 2020

A congressional committee who they can talk to.

ancianita

(38,514 posts)
10. So the Executive Branch cabinet is shaping up as a parallel run corporate system. I see now.
Fri Aug 14, 2020, 10:41 PM
Aug 2020

Like Congress, the Pentagon probably has no control or oversight over the thousands of privatized militias that exist, either.

Nice way to make a democratic republic eat that corporate elephant. One bite at a time.

Socialized through our taxes. Advised by oligarchs.

Cosmo Blues

(2,760 posts)
11. Non-disclosure agreements
Sat Aug 29, 2020, 04:46 PM
Aug 2020

Pretty sure you can't have a non-disclosure agreement in government, at least not for non-classified documents

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Congress»Firm Helping Run Federal ...