Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Congress
Related: About this forumIn Senate-CIA fight on interrogation report, another controversy
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/08/27/237763/in-senate-cia-fight-on-interrogation.html?sp=/99/200/111/In Senate-CIA fight on interrogation report, another controversy
By Ali Watkins and Marisa Taylor
McClatchy Washington Bureau
August 27, 2014
WASHINGTON The background of a key negotiator in the battle over a Senate report on the CIAs use of interrogation techniques widely denounced as torture has sparked concerns about the Obama administrations objectivity in handling the studys public release.
Robert Litt, the general counsel for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, is a former defense lawyer who represented several CIA officials in matters relating to the agencys detention and interrogation program. Now hes in a key position to determine what parts of the Senate Intelligence Committees 6,300-page report will be made public.
Litts involvement doesnt appear to be an ethics issue, at least by the legal definition. But experts say that while it may be acceptable on paper, his involvement in the review should have been a red flag.
It does not cross the very low bar that the profession sets for an impermissible conflict of interest, said Jack Marshall, the president and founder of ProEthics Ltd., a national ethics consulting and training company that has provided seminars to government lawyers, including those employed by the CIA. But it is the kind of conflict of interest that should be avoided at all costs. The government has to be held to a higher standard.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1500 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Senate-CIA fight on interrogation report, another controversy (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Aug 2014
OP
merrily
(45,251 posts)1. What can we do to raise that very low bar?
unhappycamper
(60,364 posts)2. Vote. n/t
merrily
(45,251 posts)3. I have voted since I reached voting age, but, per the OP, that bar is still very low.
So I don't think that, in reality, my voting is either the problem or the solution.
I don't think only one party is totally responsible for the current state of the ethics rules, either.
But, thank you for the suggestion.