Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumAP calls SD for HRC in major upset!! (Edit)
Last edited Tue Jun 7, 2016, 10:56 PM - Edit history (24)
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/south-dakotaPeacetrain
(23,627 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)William769
(55,818 posts)FloridaBlues
(4,367 posts)William769
(55,818 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Her Sister
(6,444 posts)Oh mY!!!
ismnotwasm
(42,454 posts)awesome!
book_worm
(15,951 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)I thought it was a Bernie state.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)sheshe2
(87,490 posts)A pleasant one.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)SD is looking to be an upset.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)I wonder if we'll see this in ND, too, and how much is due to the NA vote.
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)SD semi closed primary 85 % white
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Clinton leads by 7 points, with 43% reporting
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Up a bit!
SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)Still a lot of Sioux Falls out.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)That is Sioux Falls, but still this is closer than I thought it would be.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Her Sister
(6,444 posts)Looking good!!!!
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)NATE SILVER 9:47 PM
What Is It About Clinton And South Dakota?
But a win there would break the demographic patterns were used to seeing, since South Dakota is a predominantly white state that allows independents to vote in its primaries similar to the states that have gone for Sanders.
Our demographic model had Sanders favored in South Dakota although, note, it had Obama favored in South Dakota in 2008, so maybe theres something about the demographics there that are hard to pick up.
One factor could be the Native American population, which is about 9 percent of the states population. But that doesnt seem like a likely reason. Sanders is running well in counties that overlap with Native American reservations. And Sanders won Oklahoma, which also has a large Native American vote.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/june-7-new-jersey-california-primary-presidential-election-2016/
book_worm
(15,951 posts)BootinUp
(49,023 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)and Bernie is losing it (so far) which is a surprise. But he did win a caucus!
book_worm
(15,951 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)Still waiting on Sioux Falls.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Looks like we will get SD quite wrong - but most others did too. No polling. Congrats Sabato! But we got deadshot accuracy on New Jersey.
https://twitter.com/benchmarkpol
spooky3
(36,204 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)No - no call on SD yet. Minnehaha could change everything. Clinton has a 90% shot at winning right now but I wouldn't call it yet.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Still waiting to make a call due to still a lot of the Sioux Falls vote being out.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)Only 1500 votes separate Clinton and Sanders in SD, and there are TONS out in Minnehaha. However, Sanders won't make up the gap at this rate
book_worm
(15,951 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)Benchmark Politics @benchmarkpol 2m2 minutes ago
1) Sanders has a lot of rural counties only 50% in and 2) Minnehaha still isn't in enough to ensure a safe call.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)Getting closer! Hope Benchmark is right about calling it for HRC.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Benchmark Politics @benchmarkpol 2m2 minutes ago
Hmmm - Pennington County showed 46/47 precincts reporting. Didn't change precincts but added 1k votes. to Sanders in SD.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)Clinton leads by 3 points, or 1,088 votes, with 75% reporting
book_worm
(15,951 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)Clinton leads by 3 points, or 1,088 votes, with 80% reporting
book_worm
(15,951 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)LiberalFighter
(53,467 posts)spooky3
(36,204 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)Because of an error at the AP, Sanders strongest county went from 99% reporting to 33% reporting. He currently has a +500 margin there 1of2
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Benchmark Politics @benchmarkpol 3m3 minutes ago
Honestly - we would call South Dakota for Clinton but because AP revised numbers, SD numbers are extremely hard to trust right now.
spooky3
(36,204 posts)I think Sanders will be more likely to quit if she is able to win SD and California. I know the delegate count in SD is irrelevant but I think it's an emotional thing with him - the more it looks like a sweep, the more likely he is going to be to see it's over.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)I think HRC has this.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)spooky3
(36,204 posts)vdogg
(1,385 posts)Sanders strongest county went from 99% reporting to 33%. There was some screw up by the AP. She probably still has SD but they have to reverify some stuff.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Clinton leads by 3 points, or 1,457 votes, with 91% reporting
Number23
(24,544 posts)If ever there was a state with demographics that favored Sanders, you would have thought SD would be at the top of the pile.
She should have been happy/proud with a competitive LOSS in South Carolina but to actually be ahead??! It's unreal.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)I'm not going to go to bed until they call SD for HRC!!
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)Hope we win SD!
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)Woooohooo! Can go to bed now! You did a great job posting all these updates!!