Hillary Clinton

DLCWIdem

(1,580 posts) Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:53 PM Jun 2016

Uh oh does someone need to tell rachel that Clinton gets top billing

Rachel is just talking about a Warren-Clinton ticket not a Clinton/Warren ticket. Her excitement was fairly obvious.But someone needs to tell her Clinton is the nominee.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Uh oh does someone need to tell rachel that Clinton gets top billing (Original Post) DLCWIdem Jun 2016 OP

Sounds like a slip to me. Nothing to worry about. leftofcool Jun 2016 #1

oh my. I am not watching so that for the news. riversedge Jun 2016 #2

Hey, Rachel is very familiar with Senator Warren's coyness. yallerdawg Jun 2016 #3

My reaction was "what else could she say"? spooky3 Jun 2016 #5

"Yes, I am." Not an answer we heard last year! yallerdawg Jun 2016 #6

I don't agree. Rachel presented it as "Ed Rendell spooky3 Jun 2016 #7

Her answer has always been, "I like the job I have." yallerdawg Jun 2016 #8

yeah maybe Rendell was a little chauvinistic DLCWIdem Jun 2016 #9

Yes. Good point. complain jane Jun 2016 #11

I cringe when I see Ed Rendell or Harold Ford used a Democratic Party experts or representatives SharonClark Jun 2016 #13

I'm guessing Rachel is a bit of a Bernie Bro at home. Walk away Jun 2016 #4

She was a little favorable to him, at first. So IMO she thinks EW was the closest to Bernie's views DLCWIdem Jun 2016 #10

She may be a Bernie supporter at home justiceischeap Jun 2016 #12

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)

1. Sounds like a slip to me. Nothing to worry about.

Reply to DLCWIdem (Original post)

Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:55 PM

Jun 2016

riversedge

(73,127 posts)

2. oh my. I am not watching so that for the news.

Reply to DLCWIdem (Original post)

Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:56 PM

Jun 2016

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)

3. Hey, Rachel is very familiar with Senator Warren's coyness.

Reply to DLCWIdem (Original post)

Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:03 PM

Jun 2016

Rachel got a remarkable answer from Senator Warren tonight!

Asked if she thought she could be president, Senator Warren answered, "Yes, I do."

Way to go, Rachel.

Now, will Hillary ask?

spooky3

(36,204 posts)

5. My reaction was "what else could she say"?

Reply to yallerdawg (Reply #3)

Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:35 PM

Jun 2016

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)

6. "Yes, I am." Not an answer we heard last year!

Reply to spooky3 (Reply #5)

Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:44 PM

Jun 2016

She didn't want to run for president, but she is ready to be president!

You don't know how remarkable that is.

She is telling Hillary, "Just ask!"

spooky3

(36,204 posts)

7. I don't agree. Rachel presented it as "Ed Rendell

Reply to yallerdawg (Reply #6)

Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:46 PM

Jun 2016

Says you're not ready to be VP." I didn't see Warren as saying she wants the job, but rather that's she's qualified for the job.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)

8. Her answer has always been, "I like the job I have."

Reply to spooky3 (Reply #7)

Thu Jun 9, 2016, 09:54 PM

Jun 2016

Ed Rendell is just an example of pundit questioning why Senator Warren might not be running for president or wanting to be vice-president.

This question was related to the most important role of being vice-president.

Asked, "Are you ready?" she said, "Yes."