Hillary Clinton

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts) Mon Jun 20, 2016, 12:11 PM Jun 2016

Old JURY FUNCTION has been disabled. (In preparation for the New & Improved Jury System.)

Click the "alert" button on any post, and you'll see that the checkboxes for the alert reason are now gone.

No "SOP" checkbox, no "Disruptive and Over the Top" checkbox ... just a text area to send a note to the admins.

IT'S HAPPENING PEOPLE!! IT'S REALLY HAPPENING!!!

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Old JURY FUNCTION has been disabled. (In preparation for the New & Improved Jury System.) (Original Post) NurseJackie Jun 2016 OP

Alerted. NuclearDem Jun 2016 #1

rofl BootinUp Jun 2016 #2

lol TwilightZone Jun 2016 #3

LOL workinclasszero Jun 2016 #4

JURY RESULTS: 0-7 to LEAVE IT! :-P NurseJackie Jun 2016 #5

Hey! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #6

lol! Quayblue Jun 2016 #8

OMG. You guys crack me up! Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #17

no more stalkers? hmm nt msongs Jun 2016 #7

We are now under the new TOS. William769 Jun 2016 #9

I hope this will bring positive change. That said, I do wonder if there will be fewer DUers willing hlthe2b Jun 2016 #10

I hope I still take jury duty seriously under the new format. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #11

I served on a jury a few minutes ago DavidDvorkin Jun 2016 #12

Do you feel "bothered" that you won't know the outcome? hlthe2b Jun 2016 #13

Yes, it does bother me DavidDvorkin Jun 2016 #14

Yep ... by knowing the results, a juror who was a LONE "leave-it" or a LONE "hide-it" will be able… NurseJackie Jun 2016 #15

Yes.. I agree with you on that and found that did influence the way I juried.... hlthe2b Jun 2016 #16

Is this now part of the new system question everything Jun 2016 #18

yup.... I just served a short while ago and it left me feeling hlthe2b Jun 2016 #19

I was just on a jury.. it was weird.. you have to read their minds.. not an easy thing. Cha Jun 2016 #20

So you can't go and look at a thread, like in the old system? eastwestdem Jun 2016 #22

Right. And, there's all these boxes to check about what the alerter had in Cha Jun 2016 #24

Just served on one wysi Jun 2016 #21

I've missed you DU Politicub Jun 2016 #23

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)

1. Alerted.

Reply to NurseJackie (Original post)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 12:13 PM

Jun 2016

BootinUp

(49,023 posts)

2. rofl

Reply to NuclearDem (Reply #1)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 12:14 PM

Jun 2016

TwilightZone

(28,833 posts)

3. lol

Reply to NuclearDem (Reply #1)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 12:16 PM

Jun 2016

Haha

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)

4. LOL

Reply to NuclearDem (Reply #1)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 12:19 PM

Jun 2016

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)

5. JURY RESULTS: 0-7 to LEAVE IT! :-P

Reply to NuclearDem (Reply #1)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 12:24 PM

Jun 2016

On Mon Jun 20, 2016, 1:10 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Old JURY FUNCTION has been disabled. (In preparation for the New & Improved Jury System.)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1107170015#op

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Nurse Jackie just thinks she's the cat's meow.

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Jun 20, 2016, 01:15 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

sheshe2

(87,491 posts)

6. Hey!

Reply to NurseJackie (Reply #5)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 12:33 PM

Jun 2016

Quayblue

(1,045 posts)

8. lol!

Reply to NurseJackie (Reply #5)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 01:27 PM

Jun 2016

Maru Kitteh

(29,087 posts)

17. OMG. You guys crack me up!

Reply to NurseJackie (Reply #5)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 02:46 PM

Jun 2016

msongs

(70,172 posts)

7. no more stalkers? hmm nt

Reply to NurseJackie (Original post)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 12:41 PM

Jun 2016

William769

(55,818 posts)

9. We are now under the new TOS.

Reply to NurseJackie (Original post)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 01:33 PM

Jun 2016

hlthe2b

(106,342 posts)

10. I hope this will bring positive change. That said, I do wonder if there will be fewer DUers willing

Reply to NurseJackie (Original post)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 01:35 PM

Jun 2016

to participate on juries I think it is our responsibility to do so, but it does seem like (without the results feedback we are accustomed to), it will be sort of a "vacuum" process--not even rewarding the basic curiosity of "what happened afterwards"...

I understand why Skinner has chosen to go this route, though. I truly do.

LiberalFighter

(53,467 posts)

11. I hope I still take jury duty seriously under the new format.

Reply to hlthe2b (Reply #10)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 02:00 PM

Jun 2016

DavidDvorkin

(19,890 posts)

12. I served on a jury a few minutes ago

Reply to NurseJackie (Original post)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 02:17 PM

Jun 2016

The new format takes some getting used to.

hlthe2b

(106,342 posts)

13. Do you feel "bothered" that you won't know the outcome?

Reply to DavidDvorkin (Reply #12)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 02:29 PM

Jun 2016

I think curiosity is a very normal human instinct.... so I do wonder about the effect on potential jurors f there is no feedback...

DavidDvorkin

(19,890 posts)

14. Yes, it does bother me

Reply to hlthe2b (Reply #13)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 02:31 PM

Jun 2016

I liked getting that information.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)

15. Yep ... by knowing the results, a juror who was a LONE "leave-it" or a LONE "hide-it" will be able…

Reply to hlthe2b (Reply #13)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 02:32 PM

Jun 2016

... to adjust their expectations, or strictness, or leniency when they have others to compare their vote to.

hlthe2b

(106,342 posts)

16. Yes.. I agree with you on that and found that did influence the way I juried....

Reply to NurseJackie (Reply #15)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 02:35 PM

Jun 2016

question everything

(48,801 posts)

18. Is this now part of the new system

Reply to hlthe2b (Reply #13)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 03:10 PM

Jun 2016

not to notify the results?

I wish they would

hlthe2b

(106,342 posts)

19. yup.... I just served a short while ago and it left me feeling

Reply to question everything (Reply #18)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 03:59 PM

Jun 2016

as though I had no idea whether or not my efforts were worth it. Don't get me wrong, I do believe jury duty is important to the functioning of DU and will continue to do so when I can. But it does leave one wondering if their vote even registered or made a difference.