Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueMTexpat

(15,496 posts)
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 03:40 PM Jun 2016

Hillary Clinton for President: The Philadelphia Magazine Endorsement

http://www.phillymag.com/news/2016/06/21/hillary-clinton-endorsement/

The way we see it, there are only two choices in the November election. So we printed a cover for both.



The article takes a lot of potshots at Clinton, which I don't admire or like on its part. But it comes to the correct conclusion.

In Trump, we’ve got a xenophobic, impulsive, sexist, racist, unqualified con man with a soft spot for fascism. At best, his election would give future historians a definitive consensus moment to cite as the beginning of the end of the great American Republic (Napoleon in Russia; the Visigoths sack Rome). At worst, a President Trump might just kill us all by jamming that red button with his very small fingers after Vladimir Putin hurts his feelings on Twitter.

And in Clinton? We’ve got a candidate that some of us just don’t like very much.

Yeah, exactly. There’s only one choice in this election, and that’s Hillary Clinton for president.

This is the first time the editors of Philadelphia magazine have endorsed a presidential candidate. We’ve weighed in before on mayors, but the White House is out of our coverage area. Not this time, though. Not with the Democratic National Convention coming to town, and not with Donald Trump on the ballot.


11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton for President: The Philadelphia Magazine Endorsement (Original Post) BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 OP
Not a bad endorsement at all. nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #1
Perhaps I am hyper-sensitive to BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #2
And perhaps I am desensitized. BootinUp Jun 2016 #3
I need to develop a thicker skin BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #4
I'll take it. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #5
K&R! Tarheel_Dem Jun 2016 #6
K&R! DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #7
Yet another K&R! MarianJack Jun 2016 #8
Thank you, Bliue! Cha Jun 2016 #9
Great endorsement! The "unpopular" narrative from the media Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #10
My hometown! liberalnarb Jun 2016 #11

BlueMTexpat

(15,496 posts)
2. Perhaps I am hyper-sensitive to
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 04:43 PM
Jun 2016

the point, but I really get tired of the MSM memes that Clinton is an "unpopular" candidate, etc. - when she so clearly beat ALL the boys and is head and shoulders above the lot of them put together in qualifications for the job!

But yes, I did like the fact that their first endorsement EVER for a Presidential candidate is for HRC!

BootinUp

(49,023 posts)
3. And perhaps I am desensitized.
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 05:10 PM
Jun 2016

I think the fact that they did not go into any detail about her scandals is a positive. Either they didn't feel all that strong about them or they acknowledge they are bogus by doing it.

Maru Kitteh

(29,087 posts)
10. Great endorsement! The "unpopular" narrative from the media
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 10:53 PM
Jun 2016

does wear thin, but I do think we are gradually seeing it start to fade as she builds on her obvious successes.

Nice photo, Madame President!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Hillary Clinton for Presi...