https://www.theguardian.com/global/2016/aug/13/hillary-clinton-parks-and-recreation-hadley-freeman

I have never watched the show--not much of a tv watcher.


Don't like Hillary Clinton? You need to watch Parks And Recreation
https://www.theguardian.com/global/2016/aug/13/hillary-clinton-parks-and-recreation-hadley-freeman


Hadley Freeman


Obviously Clinton is Leslie Knope, the blond politico, ambitious to her bones, who, whatever you think of her politics, is undeniably devoted to public service
Amy Poehler as Leslie Knope in Parks And Recreation


https://www.theguardian.com/global/2016/aug/13/hillary-clinton-parks-and-recreation-hadley-freeman
Amy Poehler as Leslie Knope in Parks And Recreation: ‘a woman who fights like hell for political promotion, and is applauded for it.’ Photograph: Colleen Hayes/NBC
@HadleyFreeman

Saturday 13 August 2016 04.00 EDT
Last modified on Saturday 13 August 2016 15.29 EDT

Share on LinkedIn
Share on Google+



It seems increasingly obvious to me that the only sensible way to look at the US election is through the prism of Parks And Recreation. This American sitcom, which sadly came to the end of its six-year run last year, starred Amy Poehler as local government official Leslie Knope, and once you start seeing the parallels between the lovely fictional show and the horrible reality shitshow, it makes the latter feel more bearable. Obviously Hillary Clinton is Leslie, the blond politico, ambitious to her bones, who, whatever you think of her politics, is undeniably devoted to public service. Donald Trump is an amalgam of Leslie’s two worst male rivals: first, Bobby Newport, the spoilt manboy as rich in money as he is poor in self-awareness; second, the proudly offensive Jeremy Jamm, with a fondness for saying things like, “I love Chinese crap. Lucy Liu, Gangnam Style, sushi, etcetera etcetera.” .......................


It also seems increasingly obvious to me that the Clinton campaign needs to start screening Parks And Recreation at their events to solve what the media calls Clinton’s “likability problem”. This doesn’t refer to whether the electorate likes Clinton’s policies, but how they imagine her to be as a person. For the past three decades the answer to that has been, by and large, no, they don’t like her, with people hating her in the 1990s for being (if I remember correctly) an overly moralistic feminist who spat in housewives’ cookie dough, and people hating her now because they think she’s not moral enough, and that she will say anything to get elected. Clinton has generally seemed not to care about her personal unpopularity, which only made me like her more. But now she is running for the presidency against a tiny-handed Voldemort and so she is gritting her teeth and dealing with the issue. Last week she was asked, for the 10 billionth time, about her “likability issues”. Clinton replied that people like her once she’s allowed to get on with the job, which is true, given her popularity when she was secretary of state and New York senator. It was a more dignified statement than the one she gave at the Democratic national convention last month: .......................



Yes, male politicians have to pass the “Would you have a beer with me?” test. But given that Clinton has been a successful politician for 15 years, the issue of her likability is clearly about more than mere appeal. The real problem is that, while she needs to be ambitious to get as far as she has, ambitious women are seen, still, as inherently unlikable. She’s supposed to pretend that she doesn’t actually want to be commander in chief, in the way female celebrities are supposed to pretend they don’t have to starve themselves to be thin. Such things are passively attained without any unfeminine effort. ......................



.............................