Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton: A Vox Conversation on What Happened.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/9/12/16291416/hillary-clinton-vox-interview-what-happenedOn page 239 of What Happened, Hillary Clinton reveals that she almost ran a very different campaign in 2016. Before announcing for president, she read Peter Barness book With Liberty and Dividends for All, and became fascinated by the idea of using revenue from shared natural resources, like fossil fuel extraction and public airwaves, alongside revenue from taxing public harms, like carbon emissions and risky financial practices, to give every American a modest basic income.
Her ambitions for this idea were expansive, touching on not just the countrys economic ills but its political and spiritual ones. Besides cash in peoples pockets, she writes, it would be also be a way of making every American feel more connected to our country and to each other.
This is the kind of transformative vision that Clinton was often criticized for not having. Its an idea bigger than a wall, perhaps bigger even than single-payer health care or free college. But she couldnt make the numbers work. Every version of the plan she tried either raised taxes too high or slashed essential programs. So she scrapped it. That was the responsible decision, she writes. But after the 2016 election, Clinton is no longer sure that responsible is the right litmus test for campaign rhetoric. I wonder now whether we shouldve thrown caution to the wind, embraced [it] as a long-term goal and figured out the details later, she writes.
Her ambitions for this idea were expansive, touching on not just the countrys economic ills but its political and spiritual ones. Besides cash in peoples pockets, she writes, it would be also be a way of making every American feel more connected to our country and to each other.
This is the kind of transformative vision that Clinton was often criticized for not having. Its an idea bigger than a wall, perhaps bigger even than single-payer health care or free college. But she couldnt make the numbers work. Every version of the plan she tried either raised taxes too high or slashed essential programs. So she scrapped it. That was the responsible decision, she writes. But after the 2016 election, Clinton is no longer sure that responsible is the right litmus test for campaign rhetoric. I wonder now whether we shouldve thrown caution to the wind, embraced [it] as a long-term goal and figured out the details later, she writes.
The whole interview is worth the watch. It's seriously good.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1847 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton: A Vox Conversation on What Happened. (Original Post)
JHan
Sep 2017
OP
"So she scrapped it." --- She was SO MUCH MORE HONEST than ANY of her challengers. ANY!!!
NurseJackie
Sep 2017
#1
Lies and distortions are the only thing political-cultists have against her. Even now...
NurseJackie
Sep 2017
#3
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)1. "So she scrapped it." --- She was SO MUCH MORE HONEST than ANY of her challengers. ANY!!!
So she scrapped it. That was the responsible decision, she writes.
Right again! JHan
(10,173 posts)2. I haven't read the book yet but I wish she took this approach.
So much for Clinton having no vision.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)3. Lies and distortions are the only thing political-cultists have against her. Even now...
... they fear and detest and resent her so much, so the attacks continue.