Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latin America
Related: About this forumDINA: Pinochet's Directorate for Murder and Torture
JUNE 27, 2024
BY BINOY KAMPMARK
Photograph Source: Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Chile CC BY 2.0 cl
There are three sources of power in Chile: Pinochet, God and DINA.
Chilean intelligence officer, remarks to a US military attaché, 1974
Chilean intelligence officer, remarks to a US military attaché, 1974
Decree 521 of the Chilean government of June 18, 1974, was a chilling moment in the countrys convulsed history. With the state now in the pathologically disturbed hands of a military dictatorship steered by coup leader and usurper General Augusto Pinochet, the measure saw the creation of the Dirección de Inteligencia Nacional (DINA), the clandestine agency responsible for a good share of the mutilations and murders that came to typify the Cold War atrocities of the period.
DINA was, according to the decree, created for the purpose of producing intelligence collection requirements for the formulation of policies, plans and adoption of measures required for the security and development of the country. The initial impression is a military wing bureaucratically inclined, dedicated to the mundane task of producing intelligence collection requirements; for the formulation of policies, plans and adoption of measures required for the security and development of the country.
Three secret articles supplied the bloody spears to what reads like a superficially benign enterprise, a fact revealed in 1975 by José Pepe Zalaquett, a lawyer and member of the human rights organisation known as the Committee for Peace. DINA would run as a clandestine police force empowered to conduct surveillance, initiate arrests, torture detainees and liquidate individuals deemed hostile to the regime both within and outside its borders.
On August 8, 1975, the US Ambassador to Chile, David Popper, drinks the usual Cold War draught: the country positively teams with dangerous left-wing types who, while being necessarily done away with for reasons of security, are being done so in circumstances of dissimulation and deception. The cable to Washington is dismissive of death and duly cognisant of deception on the part of the Pinochet regime: We conclude that reports describing deaths of disappearances of 119 Chilean extremists outside of Chile are probably untrue, though most or all concerned are probably dead. Most probable explanation we can piece together for what will probably remain something of a mystery is that GOC Security Forces acted directly or through third party, planted reports in obscure publications to provide some means of accounting for disappearance of numerous violent leftists.
More:
https://www.counterpunch.org/2024/06/27/dina-pinochets-directorate-for-murder-and-torture/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 347 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DINA: Pinochet's Directorate for Murder and Torture (Original Post)
Judi Lynn
Jun 2024
OP
His brutal takeover was in response to Chile nationalizing corrupt US businesses.
GreenWave
Jun 2024
#2
gab13by13
(24,621 posts)1. Trump 2.0
GreenWave
(8,869 posts)2. His brutal takeover was in response to Chile nationalizing corrupt US businesses.
Several were engaging in undervalued holdings to avoid paying fair share of taxes and refused to accept the undervalue as a fair price. Others were plotting his overthrow with the CIA,
https://www.nytimes.com/1973/04/11/archives/allende-scoffs-at-funds-for-itt-says-chile-wont-pay-even-half-a.html
Judi Lynn
(162,290 posts)3. I found a free link using your link for other non-subscribers, like me:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200515163506/https://www.nytimes.com/1973/04/11/archives/allende-scoffs-at-funds-for-itt-says-chile-wont-pay-even-half-a.html
Scrolling down a bit, this is especially interesting:
NY Times, was good at giving far less than the truth even then!
I do remember Anaconda copper, Ford Motor, and Pepsi Cola in Chile were all very concerned, too. . . . . .
Have never heard the complete list, but it must be substantial!
Thank you for the real food for thought, GreenWave. :hi
Scrolling down a bit, this is especially interesting:
U.S. Stands by Denial
WASHINGTON, April 10 The State Department said toclay that it would adhere to an earlier statement by a former State Department official denying the accusation that the United States and I.T.T. conspired to prevent Dr. Allende's election in 1970.
The Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee on multinational corporations recently held seven days of hearings on I.T.T.'s involvement in Chilean affairs. During the hearings Charles A. Meyer, former Assistant Secretary of State for Inter‐American Affairs, testified that, so far as he knew, the C.I.A. was never specifically authorized to explore the possibility of using private American corporations to damage the economy of Chile in any attempt to influence the 1970 election there.
On the first day of hearings an I.T.T. official, William R. Merriam, said that William V. Broe, director of the C.I.A.'s clandestine activities in Latin America, had agreed with the recommendations that the corporation made in 1970 to try to prevent the election of Dr. Allende.
It was also revealed that I.T.T. had offered $1‐million to the United States Government to block the election of Dr. Allende. But various officials of I.T.T. and the C.I.A. gave conflicting testimony on whether the money was to be used contructively against Dr. Allende.
WASHINGTON, April 10 The State Department said toclay that it would adhere to an earlier statement by a former State Department official denying the accusation that the United States and I.T.T. conspired to prevent Dr. Allende's election in 1970.
The Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee on multinational corporations recently held seven days of hearings on I.T.T.'s involvement in Chilean affairs. During the hearings Charles A. Meyer, former Assistant Secretary of State for Inter‐American Affairs, testified that, so far as he knew, the C.I.A. was never specifically authorized to explore the possibility of using private American corporations to damage the economy of Chile in any attempt to influence the 1970 election there.
On the first day of hearings an I.T.T. official, William R. Merriam, said that William V. Broe, director of the C.I.A.'s clandestine activities in Latin America, had agreed with the recommendations that the corporation made in 1970 to try to prevent the election of Dr. Allende.
It was also revealed that I.T.T. had offered $1‐million to the United States Government to block the election of Dr. Allende. But various officials of I.T.T. and the C.I.A. gave conflicting testimony on whether the money was to be used contructively against Dr. Allende.
NY Times, was good at giving far less than the truth even then!
I do remember Anaconda copper, Ford Motor, and Pepsi Cola in Chile were all very concerned, too. . . . . .
Have never heard the complete list, but it must be substantial!
Thank you for the real food for thought, GreenWave. :hi