Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latin America
Related: About this forumSupreme Court Will Decide Fate of Mexico's Lawsuit Against U.S. Gunmakers
By Cam Edwards | 11:40 AM | October 04, 2024
We're still a few weeks away from learning what the Supreme Court will do with the challenge to Maryland's ban on so-called assault weapons, but the Court has accepted another case that could have major implications for our right to keep and bear arms. On Friday, SCOTUS granted cert to Smith & Wesson Brands, et al. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, accepting a request by gunmakers to decide whether Mexico's $10 billion lawsuit against multiple gun makers can proceed or if it should be tossed out of court based on the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.
The Mexican government (with the help of gun control veteran Jonathan Lowy) sued Smith & Wesson, Beretta, Century International Arms, Colt, Glock, and Interstate Arms alleging that the companies are aiding and abetting drug cartels in Mexico by manufacturing and selling guns like AR-15s, magazines that can hold more than ten rounds, and for refusing to adopt standards that go far beyond what U.S. law already requires for the production and sale of their products.
A U.S. District Court judge originally dismissed the case, but the First Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the lawsuit earlier this year, ruling that Mexicos lawsuit qualified for an exception to Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that authorizes suits alleging knowing violations of firearms laws that proximately cause a plaintiffs injuries. As the gunmakers informed SCOTUS in their cert petition:
To fit within that exception, the First Circuit held that Mexico plausibly alleged Americas firearms companies have violated the federal law against aiding and abetting firearms traffickingand that their regular business practices are the proximate cause of the many diffuse harms and costs that Mexico incurs from cartel violence.
In August, U.S. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor once again threw out the case against six of the seven gun makers sued by the Mexican government, ruling that the plaintiff has been "unable to muster sufficient proof to establish a sufficient relationship between the claimed injuries and the business transactions of any of the six defendants in Massachusetts." Though Mexico's government has appealed Saylor's decision to the First Circuit, the Supreme Court's decision to grant cert to the case could put an end to the lawsuit once and for all.
More:
https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2024/10/04/supreme-court-will-decide-fate-of-mexicos-lawsuit-against-us-gunmakers-n1226460
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court Will Decide Fate of Mexico's Lawsuit Against U.S. Gunmakers (Original Post)
Judi Lynn
Oct 2024
OP
Frasier Balzov
(4,942 posts)1. A worthwhile effort by Mexico.
The scourge of USA guns can very obviously be tied to the influx of migrant refugees we experience.
This connection ought to be made more vigorously.
Making the connection turns both issues of gun violence and migrants back onto the Republicans.