look at the Presidency

oh wait

Or are you simply replying to the title of the article?

You have been warned.

God what a bunch of Wussies.

The elected officials we have were put in office mostly by the 54% of the electorate who are female.

But again; none of this is germane to the OP. The article in the OP is an interesting one, and it'd be good to discuss some of the ideas in it, beyond just the title.

they are also disproportionately represented at the bottom echelons also.

Where are the women garbage collectors, construction workers, fishermen (one of the most dangerous jobs in the country), loggers (also up there), sewage workers, coal miners, and line repairmen?

Also why with this great privilege is jail almost exclusively a male domain and the vast majority of the homeless are male?



Women may not rise up as high as some men, but they also don't tend to sink as low either.

Feminists get furious when men are too successful but they have little problem when we are too unsuccessful.

but does nothing about the unsuccessful men is trying to make women superior to men, not equal.

Governor Christine Gregoire

Senator Patty Murray

Senator Maria Cantwell

Heck, even my Republican rep is female..Jaime Herrera Beutler

This must prove the "Patriarchy" is alive and well in Washington state and women are being kept down.........

oh wait.

either let a bunch of men go or arrest a lot of women to eliminate the gender imbalance caused by the . . er . . um patriarchy.

Likewise thousands of women need to be kicked out of their homes so we can get the homeless population to a roughly 50/50 mix.

Oh and suicide hotlines should stop taking calls from girls/women until suicides are roughly on par.

Equality shouldn't mean taking the good and leaving the bad.

When we let murderers out to make room for pot smokers, we have a problem, I don't care what gender they are.

to create this imbalance?

The news talks about "the bank robber and his accomplice"

But that's a complete non sequitur, it has nothing to do with the article.

The answer is, you dont. The goose gets itself out.

Robble Robble Robble.

good block Warren, but I have a sneaking suspicion that's exactly what he wanted.

There's no group that would put up with that sort of thing. None.

Never have I encounteted someone so impressed with themself, yet with so little to be impressed with.

....yet I was banned from the Meta thread because I called him what he's proud to admit he is.

Oh well.

you have that particular poster down..

"Never have I encountered someone so impressed with themself, yet with so little to be impressed with."

I've been thinking exactly the same thing for years..

you always handled him pretty well... in the face of the most juvenile shit being thrown at you. Cheers

The problem I have with some feminists who make gender privilege arguments is inevitably the only thing they want to talk about is equal outcome rather than equal opportunity. I'm a firm believer in equal opportunity. In fact, I'm quite passionate about the subject. I don't believe in equal outcome. The radical feminist argument regarding equal outcome is that the only difference between men and women is the plumbing. So all we have to do is completely reorder western society, make all gender roles neutral, and magically we will have equal outcome. That's why they only want to talk about outcome, rather than opportunity. To them, there is no difference. It's important to remember that this argument enjoys very little credibility outside the womens study departments of a few universities. As such I don't see much point in entertaining arguments that are built on that foundation.

who reflexively pals up with the likes of Ed Meese and Judith Reisman and Donald "He Restoreth Me" Hilton in their "put some clothes on and stop fucking, young lady!" agenda.

Schools for at least the last two decades have unsuccessfully tried to increase female STEMS. Failing that the feminists want to use Title IX to cut down the number of male STEMS to match the overall university makeup which is typically 60% female. The economy will be devastated by the lack of STEMS entering the workforce. That's male privilege I suppose. Somehow the lack of male nurses and educators is not a crisis though.

I had not heard of Ozy's law before, seems like a very robust concept.