Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(136,185 posts)
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 05:03 PM Apr 2022

Economists See Things One Way. 'Ordinary' People See Them Another.

((For fun! I'm NOT an economist.))


Peter Coy
OPINION

April 6, 2022, 3:30 p.m. ET

By Peter Coy

Opinion Writer

Expectations matter in economics. If people think inflation will rise, they will behave in ways that will help make it rise (e.g., asking for bigger raises). If they think the economy is about to grow robustly, they will get more confident, spend more and help create the future they anticipate.

But what happens if people’s expectations are based on an unorthodox view of how the economy works? That’s a question raised by a fascinating paper released in January that finds big gaps between how most economists view the world and how ordinary people think things work.

In textbook economic theory, for example, raising interest rates makes borrowing more expensive, which cools off economic growth and causes inflation to fall. But in a survey of 6,500 U.S. households, the researchers found that 57 percent of respondents thought that a rise in the federal funds rate, the short-term interest rate the Federal Reserve controls, would lead to a rise in inflation. That’s nearly twice as many as the 30 percent who thought it would lead to a fall in inflation.

Likewise, while 80 percent of the 1,500 economists surveyed for the paper thought that a rise in government spending would lead to a decline in the unemployment rate, only 43 percent of the general public agreed, and 39 percent thought higher spending would actually make unemployment worse.'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/06/opinion/economics-public-opinion.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Economists See Things One Way. 'Ordinary' People See Them Another. (Original Post) elleng Apr 2022 OP
Economists have empirical evidence supporting these hypotheses. The problem here spooky3 Apr 2022 #1
Economists are front men for the political agendas behind them bucolic_frolic Apr 2022 #2

spooky3

(36,220 posts)
1. Economists have empirical evidence supporting these hypotheses. The problem here
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 05:11 PM
Apr 2022

is inadequate education of the public.

bucolic_frolic

(47,054 posts)
2. Economists are front men for the political agendas behind them
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 05:14 PM
Apr 2022

In Europe, economics is known as political economy. Over here, that translates to socialist/communist. Economic forecasting is a complex mathematical discipline. There are time lags, many variables, multiple assumptions. Change one part, and it all adjusts. So you could prove A and not A at the same time if you wanted, or if different schools of economics show up.

And the general public knows far less than the economists, partly because the public view is built upon multiple schools of economic thought from differing political parties. I am very pessimistic that economics as a basis for understanding or voting behavior will ever lead to sane, logical, predictable outcomes.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Economists See Things One...