Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(115,270 posts)
Mon Nov 1, 2021, 08:26 PM Nov 2021

U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Hear Three Post-Janus Cases Over Union Dues

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear three cases in which some educators argue that unions continue to violate their First Amendment rights three years after a landmark ruling that made collecting fees from “nonconsenting” public sector employees unconstitutional.

The plaintiffs in the first two cases, Troesch v. Chicago Teachers Union and Fischer v. Murphy in New Jersey, said that so-called “escape periods” — short windows of time in which employees can opt out of paying union dues — are allowing states to avoid compliance with the court’s 2018 decision in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31.

In Janus, the court ruled that the fees violate non-union members’ First Amendment rights because that money subsidizes political and policy positions.

The court on Monday also denied a request to hear a case from a Chicago teacher, Joseph Ocol, who argues he should receive a refund for the union fees he paid. Ocol has refused to join the picket line in the past two Chicago teacher strikes in 2016 and 2019.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-supreme-court-declines-hear-192931559.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Hear Three Post-Janus Cases Over Union Dues (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2021 OP
No one should be forced to pay dues to an organization with which they disagree... VarryOn Nov 2021 #1
The UAW does not use dues money for political purposes. LiberalFighter Nov 2021 #2
 

VarryOn

(2,343 posts)
1. No one should be forced to pay dues to an organization with which they disagree...
Mon Nov 1, 2021, 09:09 PM
Nov 2021

Been there, done that. I drove a truck in most of my 20s. It was a rare union shop that supported R's. I had no choice. I was not much-loved much by my peers, even though I was pretty low-key about my politics. This was the early 80's, so they were pretty old-school in their approach to things. Our steward once told me I needed a plunger handle stuck 8 inches up my....well you can imagine. It soured me a slight bit on unions. I'm sure some have done good.

LiberalFighter

(53,465 posts)
2. The UAW does not use dues money for political purposes.
Sat Nov 13, 2021, 03:57 PM
Nov 2021

Any political campaigning or candidate donations are from voluntary member contributions.

I get difficult with police and firefighter groups with their telemarketing calls to me for that purpose. They should only be calling their members when it is political or lobbying.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»U.S. Supreme Court Declin...