Labor News & Commentary January 7, 2024 Google illegally refused to bargain with contractors etc.

https://onlabor.org/january-7-2024/

In this weekend’s news and commentary, nurses accuse healthcare provider of violating NLRA for its use of training repayment agreements; Starbucks faces mounting pressure for its anti-union actions; New York’s governor proposes paid prenatal leave; and the NLRB finds that Google illegally refused to bargain with contractors.

A group of nurses has accused CommuniCare, one of the country’s largest providers of post-acute health care, of violating the NLRA. Jeddalyn Ramos, a nurse from the Philippines who worked for CommuniCare for four months, paid the company over $15,000 in fees when she quit her job. After she paid the fee, CommuniCare sued her for $100,000 for quitting her job before the three years required by her employment agreement. It sued another Filipino former nurse—also for $100,000—who quit her job after five months. The company has claimed that it spent over $15 million to bring the nurses to the country and has invested “in the nurses through education and training.” According to the nurses, the buyout fees are training repayment fees that, according to the NLRB’s General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo, can sometimes violate the NLRA.

As the New York Times explained last week, going into the new year Starbucks is facing mounting organizing pressure. Organizing efforts by Starbucks Workers United showed signs of increased success in 2023. In the second half of 2022, it filed an average of 12 elections per month. By contrast, from October to December of 2023, it filed an average of 20 per month. In addition, in November a coalition of unions nominated three candidates for seats on the company’s board of directors. Last year a majority of shareholders supported a resolution calling for an independent audit into the company’s labor practices, and one outside observer said last year’s vote suggests shareholders could be open to the challenge. In addition, students at universities across the country have advocated to have Starbucks stores removed from campuses. Finally, Starbucks board members have faced increasing scrutiny; one board member was interrupted during an event at a university, and another had a “Mentor of the Year” award rescinded after Workers United contacted the nonprofit that gave the award.

FULL story at link above.