Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Labor News & Commentary January 23, 2024 Democrats introduce bill to increase taxes on CEO salaries
https://onlabor.org/january-23-2024/
By Sunah Chang
Sunah Chang is a student at Harvard Law School.
In todays news and commentary: CSU faculty reach a tentative deal, Democrats introduce bill to increase taxes on CEO salaries, and Florida advances bills that would loosen child labor protections.
After one day of striking, California State University faculty have reached a tentative deal, which will immediately raise salaries by 5 percent (applied retroactively from July 1, 2023) and will increase salaries by another 5 percent on July 1, 2024. The deal will also raise the salary of lowest-paid faculty members (currently set at $54,360) by $3,000 and increase paid parental leave from six weeks to 10 weeks. The deal comes after eight months of negotiations between the California Faculty Association and university management and marks a close to the first strike mobilizing faculty from all of CSUs 23 campuses.
In Washington, Bernie Sanders and a group of Democrats have introduced the Tax Excessive CEO Pay Act, which seeks to raise taxes on companies that pay their highest-paid executives at least 50 times more than what they pay their typical worker. Under the Act, the tax penalty levied against companies would increase as the CEO-to-worker salary ratio increases. Companies that pay their top executives between 50 to 100 times more than their typical workers would receive a tax penalty of 0.5 percent whereas companies that pay their top executives more than 500 times their typical workers would face the maximum tax penalty of 5 percent.
According to a press release by Bernie Sanders, the Act is projected to raise around $150 billion over 10 years and seeks to mitigate the growing wage disparities between corporate executives and workers. The bill has won endorsements from major worker-side advocacy groups and unions, including AFL-CIO, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, and Service Employees International Union. However, the bill will likely face an uphill battle in the narrowly-Democratic Senate and the Republican-controlled House of Representatives.
FULL story at link above.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 483 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Labor News & Commentary January 23, 2024 Democrats introduce bill to increase taxes on CEO salaries (Original Post)
Omaha Steve
Jan 2024
OP
Does the Tax Excessive CEO Pay Act apply to Sports and Entertainment industries?
MichMan
Jan 2024
#1
MichMan
(13,160 posts)1. Does the Tax Excessive CEO Pay Act apply to Sports and Entertainment industries?
Would the LA Lakers get hit with the penalty based on the disparity between the salaries of LeBron James compared to those selling concessions or souvenirs at the games?
Valdosta
(331 posts)2. CEO *salaries*?
They are rich enough to structure their incomes as something other than salaries.
Yes this has happened in the past when marginal tax rates were much higher than now.
That is from right after WWII up to when the Reagan administration cut taxes.
And why, out of all the filthy rich, pick on CEOs *only*?