Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Major US corporations threaten to return labor to 'law of the jungle'
Trader Joes and SpaceX are among businesses challenging the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Board
Trader Joes employees rally in lower Manhattan in support of forming a union on 18 April 2023. Photograph: Spencer Platt/Getty Images
By Steven Greenhouse
Sun 10 Mar 2024 07.00 EDT
Upset by the surge in union drives, several of the best-known corporations in the US are seeking to cripple the countrys top labor watchdog, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), by having it declared unconstitutional. Some labor experts warn that if those efforts succeed, US labor relations might return to the law of the jungle.
In recent weeks, Elon Musks SpaceX as well as Amazon, Starbucks and Trader Joes have filed legal papers that advance novel arguments aimed at hobbling and perhaps shutting down the NLRB the federal agency that enforces labor rights and oversees unionization efforts. Those companies are eager to thwart the NLRB after it accused Amazon, Starbucks and Trader Joes of breaking the law in battling against unionization and accused SpaceX of illegally firing eight workers for criticizing Musk.
Roger King, a longtime management-side lawyer who is senior labor counsel for the HR Policy Association, said it will be a lose-lose if the federal courts overturn the 89-year-old National Labor Relations Act, which has governed labor relations since Franklin Roosevelt was president. Well have the law of the jungle, the law of the streets, King said. It will be who has the most power. Its potential for chaos.
Kate Andrias, a Columbia University law professor, said workers would be hurt if the courts issue a sweeping decision that declares both the NLRB and the National Labor Relations Act unconstitutional. Without them, workers will be even worse off, she said. Its critical that they continue to exist to protect the basic right to organize and engage in collective bargaining. This is an assault on rights we have considered fundamental since the New Deal.
FULL story: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/10/starbucks-trader-joes-spacex-challenge-labor-board
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 882 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Major US corporations threaten to return labor to 'law of the jungle' (Original Post)
Omaha Steve
Mar 2024
OP
ck4829
(35,902 posts)1. Hey, slash and burn happens in the jungle, corporations.
CrispyQ
(38,238 posts)2. Why can't labor unions have constitutional rights like corporations do?
Corporations are the only non-living entity to have constitutional rights & that seems kind of discriminatory to me.
Valdosta
(331 posts)3. Law of the jungle ...
... a poetic way of describing unregulated capitalism.