Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Labor News & Commentary July 4, 2024 unionized Food 4 Less grocery workers vote to ratify new three-year labor contract
https://onlabor.org/july-4-2024/
By Luke Hinrichs
Luke Hinrichs is a student at Harvard Law School.
In todays news and commentaries, Texas federal judge grants preliminary injunction halting ban on noncompetes; Department of Labor releases proposed rule to protect workers from extreme heat; and unionized Food 4 Less grocery workers vote to ratify new three-year labor contract with the Los Angeles-based grocer.
On July 3, 2024, Judge Ada Brown of the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a Texas tax firm, issuing a preliminary injunction of the Federal Trade Commissions (FTC) rule banning noncompete agreements. The lawsuit was filed just hours after the FTC voted 3-2 to issue the nationwide ban. The temporary injunction halts the ban that was set to take effect September 4 until the court rules on the merits of the case on or before August 30, 2024. Judge Brown, appointed by President Trump in 2019, enjoined the rule for lack of statutory authority and on arbitrary and capricious grounds. Rejecting a nationwide injunction and refusing to extend the injunction to the Chamber of Commerces associational members for lack of standing, Judge Browns ruling only provides relief to the named plaintiffs in the matter. Notably, although the matter did not turn on the application of the recently decided Loper Bright holding, Judge Browns ruling cited the decision for the general proposition that [t]he deference that Chevron requires of courts reviewing agency action cannot be squared with the APA.
The Biden Administrations Department of Labor officially released their proposed new rule to address excessive heat risks in the workplace on Tuesday, July 2, 2024. If finalized, the proposed role is estimated to protect roughly 36 million workers in indoor and outdoor work settings, such as farmworkers, delivery and construction workers, and workers in warehouses and factories. Under the Occupational Safety and Health Administrations (OSHA) proposed rule, employers would be required to identify heat hazards, develop emergency response plans, and establish rest breaks, provide shade and water, and heat acclimatization. The rule establishes an initial heat trigger at a heat index of 80°F and a high heat trigger at a heat index of 90°F or a wet bulb globe temperature equal to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Healths recommended limit. The proposal increases penalties for heat-related workplace violations.
On Wednesday, July 3, 2024, the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) announced that the unionized workers of Food 4 Less voted to ratify a new three-year labor contract after the workers had previously authorized a strike if labor talks had failed. The new agreement covers 6,000 low-wage grocery workers across 15 Food 4 Less stores in the Los Angeles area. Food 4 less is a subsidiary of the major grocery company, The Kroger Company. The ratified labor contract includes wage increase for all workers, increased starting wage rates, more guaranteed hours for part-time workers, a reduction in the hour threshold to receive the top pay rate, additional premiums for select positions, and bonuses for all workers. Support for the new contract is not uniform across workers, with some reports noting discontent among union members.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 281 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post