Poverty
Related: About this forumThe Insidiousness of Unchecked Capitalism
Americans sometimes have difficulty recognizing the insidiousness of unchecked capitalism the insidiousness of the belief greed is good. Unchecked capitalism can be characterized by capitalism that is unregulated and callous, ruthless, or corrupt.
A belief that capitalism can do it all denies the belief its not all about me that comes with morality, responsibility, and religion.
A belief that capitalism can do it all also ignores the need for a healthy competition achieved through regulation. For example, leaders in industry have previously expressed a desire to be regulated by government to achieve fairness in environmental regulation, since being under a system that relies on companies voluntarily purchasing pollution-reducing technology means those that do so are at a financially competitive disadvantage to those that dont. Without this regulation, a prevailing business environment lacking in restraint is fostered.
In addition, a belief that capitalism can do it all denies a greater good that goes beyond mere greed being good. It therefore denies the commonweal as well.
Though we have a right to the fruits of our labors, we also have a responsibility to share nonessential resources with fellow persons in need. Moreover, all persons have a right to share in the resources of the planet.
For those that have and those that have not, finding a cause greater than ourselves can be rewarding.
By James Schacht, author of The Future of Democracy in America and the World: A Few Possibilities, see more at TheFutureofDemocracy.org
jimmyolsenblues
(28 posts)In either way, people's greed spoils it.
It all comes down to people, if people think more about how much they can take , then how much they help others.
We as a collective race as just cockroaches instead of the full potential we could become through helping others first.
nicosgramsci
(1 post)If socialism truly existed (China and the USSR is and was not "socialism" , greed wouldn't matter or exist. It comes down to eliminating the capital-labor relationship *and* abolishing private property (in other words, using property as a *social relationship* whereas one can exploit another). Personal property (a relationship between a person and a thing) is fine. Fundamentally, this is socialism. Capitalism, on the other hand, not only breeds greed, but thrives off it. Inherently, it is a system that allows for widespread exploitation.