Watch out some economists are floating the idea of confiscating
your 401k and IRA to fund SS. Those of us that saved money for retirement my end up paying for those that
didn't.
https://www.kiplinger.com/taxes/should-401k-be-eliminated-to-save-social-security?utm_term=1686D33E-65EF-4642-B861-F47F1701F88D&lrh=9a3aeac9e77c00e54a0f7afa1f33462c415a8ab91a6ac2bf4a3ec47adf9ea844&utm_campaign=231AB69E-1652-46EB-A977-6F2C6C998083&utm_medium=email&utm_content=B2151453-044B-442D-8B27-A64944E5C790&utm_source=SmartBrief
Scrivener7
(52,724 posts)doc03
(36,694 posts)as confiscate to me. I pay into my IRA/401K and they take it to fund SS, what else is it. I put
a percentage of my income in an IRA and later in a 401K, I can now withdraw more for my IRA every
month for the rest of my life than I get from SS.
3Hotdogs
(13,392 posts)TheFarseer
(9,494 posts)Like they were advocating eliminating preferential tax treatment for those retirement plans. I personally think that would be an Ok idea.
On edit - So really you would just have a brokerage account then and you would still be getting a special low tax rate on cap gains and dividends. Doesnt sound so bad.
doc03
(36,694 posts)the program. The tax is not eliminated by putting money in a 401k or IRA it is "deferred" until you withdraw.
The whole idea of the 401k and IRA was to encourage people to save for their retirement.
3Hotdogs
(13,392 posts)The money you put in would still be there. I don't support the elimination of the tax benefits.
Scrivener7
(52,724 posts)And the article isn't saying they are.
SWBTATTReg
(24,085 posts)the ability to fund your own 401Ks and IRAs will diminish or reduce in the amounts you can put into these accounts. This option has been mentioned too in the past.
Ocelot II
(120,813 posts)The discussion is about whether the tax advantages of these plans should be repealed.
doc03
(36,694 posts)Last edited Thu May 9, 2024, 08:14 AM - Edit history (1)
and IRAs to bolster SS. If you eliminate the tax break for a 401k and an IRA you are in
effect eliminating the 401k and IRA. What would be the point of having a 401k or IRA
without the tax break. It is not a tax break, it is a tax deferment, you pay when you withdraw.
It would be no different than putting your money in a savings account or the Wall Street casino.
Ocelot II
(120,813 posts)Your existing plan wouldn't be taken from you; new plans with the tax advantages of existing plans would no longer be offered. That's not confiscation.
doc03
(36,694 posts)401k and IRAs. Either way they are reneging on a promise they made to get you to invest for your retirement.
We were told you can invest in a 401k and your tax will be deferred until you withdraw. It was a plan to get
workers to put their money in Wall Street since they couldn't privatize SS.
Scrivener7
(52,724 posts)You aren't going to lose your accounts.
bucolic_frolic
(46,970 posts)One of them an American Enterprise Institute guy. Conservative think tank. What do you expect?
It's a constantly warring sleight-of-hand. They tax traditional IRAs, but not Roth, except a few states for estate tax purposes, and strict rules on inheriting a Roth IRA. Some SS is taxed for higher earners post-retirement, there are some exclusions. The uncertainty and changing landscape causes people to not pay close attention, or care very much.
SS was designed for old age support - rent, heat, food, healthcare. The components of retirement costs are complex. Wealthy people have trust funds, and due to estate tax law, have loopholes to the point they really can take it with them.
It's just like the internet. We're so much safer doing things online now that every hack can locate, target, swat, swindle, loot, and compromise our private records. Major financial companies advise - check your accounts every day.
doc03
(36,694 posts)for this exact reason. They would say you can't trust the government they will find a way to take that money.
This was a contract with the public to encourage people to save for their retirement. Yes, you get a tax break
when you put your money in but you also pay tax on the capital gains as regular income rather than the lower
Capitol Gains tax when you take it out. In addition, your income from an IRA subject your SS to tax, I paid tax
on 85% of my SS last year.
Think. Again.
(17,906 posts)...so your fear of paying for people who didn't save is...well, weird.
doc03
(36,694 posts)saved to put money in my 401K so I could retire with some dignity. I pay tax on 85% of my
SS while those I worked with who didn't plan for their retirement keep all their SS. Now they propose taking the
tax break for a 401k from future retirees. If they take the tax break away they are in effect eliminating the
401k and the IRA, there would be no reason to have them it would be the same as just putting your money
in a bank account or just buying stocks.
58Sunliner
(4,981 posts)Happy Hoosier
(8,382 posts)I think there is zero percent chance they eliminate these programs going forward UNLESS they are replaced with a different program, or social security is actively expanded.
There is already a retirement crisis in this country, there is no chance that they make it worse with a ham-handed measure like this.