Education
Related: About this forumStudents have no ‘right’ to quality education, CA state court rules
A divided state appeals court ruled Wednesday that Californias anemic level of school funding does not violate students constitutional right to an education of some quality because no such right exists.
The 2-1 decision by the First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco upheld a judges dismissal of a suit filed by some of the states major participants in public education school boards and administrators, the California Teachers Association and State PTA, and nine school districts, including San Francisco and Alameda. The plaintiffs argued that a state that trails nearly every other state in per-pupil spending, staffing and student achievement violates Californias 1879 constitutional guarantee of a school system that encourages the promotion of intellectual ... improvement.
Similar suits have been filed in other states, and a majority have been successful, with courts in at least six states finding that their school finance systems violated students rights. Last year, the Washington state Supreme Court held its Legislature in contempt for failing to increase funding and imposed a fine of $100,000 a day, which is still in effect.
But the San Francisco court said the right to a public education, guaranteed by the California Constitution, does not include a right to any particular level of educational quality or funding.
more
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Court-California-students-have-no-right-to-7278567.php
How nice of them to clarify this for the proles
CompanyFirstSergeant
(1,558 posts)Of course if this were happening in America....
...the nation that manufactured enough ships and weapons to win World War II...
....gave itself less than ten years to send a man to the moon....
....and built the internet, then....
....there would be a solid right to an education.
But this story takes place in CAzakstan, so what do you expect???
What.... wait a minute....
This is happening in California...
Oh shit.....
Never mind.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)2naSalit
(92,752 posts)JayhawkSD
(3,163 posts)...whether such a right exists or not, it is in the best interest of any society to provide such education, and deeply stupid not to. A well educated population makes better decisions regarding governance in a democracy, and creates a vastly highly greater level of prosperity in any economy which is not totalitarian.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)Not in a totalitarian society. A poorly educated population is more easily led.
JayhawkSD
(3,163 posts)What part of "best for the society" do you not get? That a society is more easily led is better for the oligarchy that "leads" it, but it most certainly is not better for the society itself.
elleng
(136,108 posts)but such a 'right' does have to be set out explicitly in statute or constitution.
I'm pleased to see that my high school continues to be one of the best: http://liherald.com/rockvillecentre/stories/South-Side-High-School-named-one-of-best,78940
I wish my grandkids lived there.
JayhawkSD
(3,163 posts)..are not rights granted by the constitution, but are guarantees that inherent rights cannot be taken away.