Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 08:23 AM Apr 2016

Students have no ‘right’ to quality education, CA state court rules

A divided state appeals court ruled Wednesday that California’s anemic level of school funding does not violate students’ constitutional right to an education of “some quality” because no such right exists.

The 2-1 decision by the First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco upheld a judge’s dismissal of a suit filed by some of the state’s major participants in public education — school boards and administrators, the California Teachers Association and State PTA, and nine school districts, including San Francisco and Alameda. The plaintiffs argued that a state that trails nearly every other state in per-pupil spending, staffing and student achievement violates California’s 1879 constitutional guarantee of a school system that encourages “the promotion of intellectual ... improvement.”

Similar suits have been filed in other states, and a majority have been successful, with courts in at least six states finding that their school finance systems violated students’ rights. Last year, the Washington state Supreme Court held its Legislature in contempt for failing to increase funding and imposed a fine of $100,000 a day, which is still in effect.

But the San Francisco court said the right to a public education, guaranteed by the California Constitution, does not include a right to any particular level of educational quality or funding.

more
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Court-California-students-have-no-right-to-7278567.php

How nice of them to clarify this for the proles

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Students have no ‘right’ to quality education, CA state court rules (Original Post) n2doc Apr 2016 OP
What do you expect from a third world nation? CompanyFirstSergeant Apr 2016 #1
GATS caused this mess, IMHO, and TISA is making it worse Baobab May 2016 #8
That's really messed up.....nt 2naSalit Apr 2016 #2
I agree that, perhaps, no such right exists, but, BUT... JayhawkSD Apr 2016 #3
Depends on the society n2doc Apr 2016 #4
Way to miss the point. JayhawkSD Apr 2016 #6
This is sad, elleng Apr 2016 #5
Yes, most of the rights mentioned in the constitution's bill of rights... JayhawkSD Apr 2016 #7
 

CompanyFirstSergeant

(1,558 posts)
1. What do you expect from a third world nation?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 08:40 AM
Apr 2016

Of course if this were happening in America....

...the nation that manufactured enough ships and weapons to win World War II...

....gave itself less than ten years to send a man to the moon....

....and built the internet, then....

....there would be a solid right to an education.


But this story takes place in CAzakstan, so what do you expect???

What.... wait a minute....

This is happening in California...

Oh shit.....

Never mind.

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
3. I agree that, perhaps, no such right exists, but, BUT...
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:55 AM
Apr 2016

...whether such a right exists or not, it is in the best interest of any society to provide such education, and deeply stupid not to. A well educated population makes better decisions regarding governance in a democracy, and creates a vastly highly greater level of prosperity in any economy which is not totalitarian.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
4. Depends on the society
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:00 AM
Apr 2016

Not in a totalitarian society. A poorly educated population is more easily led.

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
6. Way to miss the point.
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 12:11 AM
Apr 2016

What part of "best for the society" do you not get? That a society is more easily led is better for the oligarchy that "leads" it, but it most certainly is not better for the society itself.

elleng

(136,108 posts)
5. This is sad,
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:50 AM
Apr 2016

but such a 'right' does have to be set out explicitly in statute or constitution.

I'm pleased to see that my high school continues to be one of the best: http://liherald.com/rockvillecentre/stories/South-Side-High-School-named-one-of-best,78940

I wish my grandkids lived there.

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
7. Yes, most of the rights mentioned in the constitution's bill of rights...
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 12:12 AM
Apr 2016

..are not rights granted by the constitution, but are guarantees that inherent rights cannot be taken away.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»Students have no ‘right’ ...