The part that I shook my head over is when they claim the teachers union bans the teachers from tutoring after school. I wonder if this particular union also tells its members when they should fold their laundry.

What union - ANYWHERE - tells its members what they can and can't do during their non working hours? That's just an insane claim.

Here's the review I mentioned: http://garyrubinstein.teachforus.org/2012/09/07/my-review-of-wont-back-down-spoiler-alert/

How can they get away with attributing a manufactured quote to an actual person?

There were so many things wrong - from little things like the drab hallways of the public school becoming filled with colorful art after the takeover, to major things like the absence of special education services - or at least the avoidance of any remedial programs for the main charaters' children.

People watch FOX "News" and accept it as truth. They bought Waiting for Superman without question. Glad to see a number of reviews that point out the propaganda.

You can't moonlight for pay in the same field. You would be competing with the union.

I don't know of any specific teachers union bans on the practice, but I do know that in some areas, you can hire a (certified teacher) tutor directly from the union (or sometimes from a for-profit subsidiary of the union). It wouldn't be a big stretch to imagine that those unions wouldn't allow their members to moonlight in competition with them (sometimes through the county schools).

It's also possible that the movie is (gasp!) lying. I haven't seen it, but I'd bet that if a union told its members not to provide unpaid after-school tutoring (which so many teachers do as a matter of course), that the producers of the film might spin that as a "ban on teachers tutoring after school".