Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

harpslay

(61 posts)
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 01:32 PM Dec 2012

Orwellian Education

Read this bit the other day, and am curious to hear what the thoughts of UDers are on it.

Basically it asks the question: can schools "nurture students" in the direction of economically "useful" jobs in order to safeguard future economic growth. I find the notion really misguided. While it makes sense to me to, perhaps, provide students with information about what sectors are likely to experience job growth in the future, it's tough for anyone to know for sure where economic growth + new jobs are going to come from. Generally speaking, fostering creativity is more important for future economic growth in my view, especially seeing as how success is increasingly spontaneous and predicated on a good idea, that's well executed on a business level.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Orwellian Education (Original Post) harpslay Dec 2012 OP
Since public education really got its start SheilaT Dec 2012 #1
That's not true. duffyduff Dec 2012 #2
Please read and learn. mbperrin Dec 2012 #3
Thank you. SheilaT Dec 2012 #4
The purpose of public education sulphurdunn Dec 2012 #5
i'd say it's been both. Business always had the guiding hand in determining what the status quo HiPointDem Dec 2012 #7
I can only imagine... AnneD Dec 2012 #6
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
1. Since public education really got its start
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 01:40 PM
Dec 2012

in this country as a way to provide adequately educated people for the workforce, this is just the logical extension of that.

I do agree that education ought to be about more, such as giving people the tools with which to think critically and solve problems.

 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
2. That's not true.
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 02:47 PM
Dec 2012

You got it exactly backwards. It was founded to create a more informed citizenry.

Training people for jobs had nothing to do with it.

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
5. The purpose of public education
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 01:10 PM
Dec 2012

was and remains literacy, in what ever area you wish to have a literate populace. What should alarm us is that under the "Common Core Standards" being proposed for public schools include replacing or demphasizing literary works like "Catcher in the Rye", "Huckleberry Fin" and "To Kill a Mockingbird" at the high school level with more informative, non-literary texts. This type of change will be very useful in producing the next generation of cubicle drones for corporate America. Of course it is not even being considered at private, Ivy League preparatory academies like Choate, Groton and Exiter, where the children of the ruling class will continue to read great works of literature and rule over the cubicle drones our children are designated to become.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
7. i'd say it's been both. Business always had the guiding hand in determining what the status quo
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 12:21 AM
Dec 2012

would be. But there were also definite counter-currents, both on the part of individuals and organized movements.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»Orwellian Education