I did attend a very rural two-teacher, eight-grade brick school in the country, but we didn't actually get involved in ag, though my grandmother, who raised me, had a significant garden and orchard and we raised poultry and occasionally slaughtered a pig.

All over Kansas and other largely rural states, the death of a school often leads to the death of a town. The state is top heavy with school districts because of its geography and the desire (in every town) to keep schools open and avoid the dreaded merger of rural school districts.

Kansas is looking at serious economic issues, a drastic drop in school funding (thank you Sam Brownback) and a drop in the tax base that supports schools. The inevitable solution will result in fewer schools and school districts.

Thanks to a federal grant, this town was able to save its school. As long as the money keeps coming, the school will remain open. But the future for public education in Kansas - for both traditional and charter schools - is bleak. The current state legislature will not support the level of funding that this school in Walton requires to stay open. That's the reality. Unless we can change the legislature, this one school will remain one success story in a state that has a long history of successfully educating its children.

needs to be in suburbia, and in cities, where kids aren't exposed to farms like rural kids are.

And, of course, it doesn't have to be a charter school. If tptb were not so obsessed with destroying public schools with their standardized obsession with testing, using charters as a privatization tool, there could be all kinds of different formats presented through regular public education. Where, it must be pointed out, kids are still learning, if not with the joy and breadth we could provide them freed from the education deformer's policies.

I teach in a rural school. It's a public school, to be sure. We do a little gardening, but not much, since we can have frost any day of the year and by the time it's safe to put things in the ground it's about time to take off for the summer. Still, we do a little and kids enjoy it.

Not that they really need to. Living rurally, most of my students grow and raise much of their own food already. I get new kids, not children, attending parent/student conferences; lambs brought in for demonstrations; gifts of jerky, of fresh and home-canned produce. My students expect to see me touring the barns at the local county fair, so they can show off their pigs, sheep, goats, cows, chickens, rabbits, etc., not just to the judges, but to me. Some of my students volunteer at a local pumpkin farm about 3 miles from school each fall, taking tickets for the corn maze, supervising the petting zoo, giving rides in carts pulled by draft horses out to the fields to pick pumpkins, helping weigh them upon the carts' return, and taking turns as announcers at the ever popular pumpkin cannons. A lot of our classes for younger students travel those 3 miles down the road for "farm day" field trips, but it's mostly just for fun; few of them actually need the experience. They already get it.

It's commonplace for a student to show up with his parent, some farm baby in his arms, for parent conferences. The farm baby gets casually passed from person to person while we talk about academic achievement, and the student calmly and quickly deals with any "output" from the baby.

It's also not uncommon to arrive at school at dawn and find a deer or two on the playground; we make sure they find their way out before the busses show up.

I'll repeat it: a farm-themed school is great. I'd love to see it in suburbia and in the city, where people are disconnected from where their food comes from, and I'd like to see it be a fully public school.

is important in their lives? Even the teachers in public schools?

But, yeah. That's not going to happen.

Work that way more often in private schools. Too bad the publics can't (often) adopt such approach.