Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Education
Related: About this forumWhy I Defend Randi by Diane Ravitch
Much food for thought . . .
<skip>
As you know, I have criticized the Common Core in many posts. I have criticized the lack of transparency and the lack of educator participation in its development. I have criticized the fact that the Gates Foundation paid out nearly $200 million to develop and promote the CCSS, which really means they are the Gates Standards. I have said that rigorous standards will not solvelet alone addressthe economic dysfunction at the root of educational inequalityand is likely to exacerbate it.
Randi Weingarten is certainly more positive about Common Core than I am. She is the president of the AFT and has been willing to engage on the issues, while the NEA has remained supportive of Common Core and silent.
I have long believed that Randi would ultimately change course, and she has done so recently. First, she called for a moratorium on testing. only days ago, she came out in opposition to VAM, saying that VAM is a sham. She has followed her reasoning to its logical conclusion, which is that Common Core should be decoupled from testing. If Common Core is in fact decoupled from testing, it loses its power as a means of rating and ranking students and teachers and principals. It becomes a set of standards that may or may not prove useful but has no power to ruin lives and careers
The next, inevitable step is to recognize that Common Core must be amended by teachers and scholars. As it currently exists, it is an infallible edict encased in concrete. No standards are so perfect that they need never be updated.
I will not attack Randi, not only because she is a personal friend, not only because she is showing the capacity to evolve and change her mind, but because we who object to the current demolition derby cant prevail without the support of at least one of the major unions. In short, we need her leadership. To turn against her is to wound our cause irreparably, our cause being the survival of public education and the teaching profession. To attack one of our few national leaders in the middle of a crucial war will aid those who are attacking public education and teachers. If we who are allies fight one another, we lose. I prefer success to defeat. Too much is riding on the outcome of these questions to indulge in ideological purity and cast out those who are not in complete agreement.
more . . . http://dianeravitch.net/2014/01/12/why-i-defend-randi/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 2400 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why I Defend Randi by Diane Ravitch (Original Post)
proud2BlibKansan
Jan 2014
OP
elleng
(135,687 posts)1. Glad to see this.
Sorry it took Randi so long, but pleased its happening. Maybe there's hope???
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)6. She's coming around.
Randi is also on Twitter @rweingarten and on Facebook daily. She will answer questions and discuss issues.
Meanwhile, the NEA prez remains silent. So glad I don't belong to his union.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)2. k&r for exposure. n/t
-Laelth
diddlysquat
(1,156 posts)3. What is VAM?
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)5. Value Added Measurement
It's a fancy way to play with numbers to tie student achievement to teacher evaluation and pay. Mathematically, it doesn't make any sense.
Response to proud2BlibKansan (Original post)
diddlysquat This message was self-deleted by its author.
Squinch
(52,397 posts)7. Love Diane and glad to hear Randi is coming around, but she was very instrumental in
getting us into the mess we are in. I'm not at the forgiveness stage yet. (Crap. Do I sound like Christie?)